Abstract
Background
Multimorbidity, defined as the concurrent presence of ≥ 2 chronic conditions, and chronic pain (i.e., pain lasting ≥3 months) often co-exist. Multimodal pain management that includes non-pharmacologic treatment and non-opioid therapy is recommended to prevent serious risks associated with opioids.
Purpose
Estimate the prevalence of types of pain treatment and analyze their associations with multimorbidity using a nationally representative survey in the United States (US).
Methods
Data was collected from the 2020 National Health Interview Survey among adults with chronic pain and chronic conditions (N= 12,028). Chronic pain management was grouped into four categories: opioid therapy; non-opioid multimodal pain treatment; pain treatment with monotherapy; and no pain treatment. Chi-square tests and multivariable multinomial logistic regressions were used to analyze the association of multimorbidity with types of pain treatment after controlling for age, sex, social determinants of health (SDoH), and lifestyle characteristics.
Results
Among NHIS respondents, 68% had multimorbidity. In adjusted multinomial logistic regressions with “pain management with monotherapy” as the reference group, those with multimorbidity were more likely to utilize opioids (AOR=1.63, 95% CI=1.23, 2.17). Those with severe pain were also more likely to use opioid therapy (AOR=19.36, 95% CI=13.35, 28.06) than those with little pain. Those with low income and education were less likely to have multimodal pain management without opioids.
Conclusion
Seven in 10 adults had multimorbidity. Those with multimorbidity reported severe pain and relied on opioids for pain control. Regardless of multimorbidity status, SDoH was associated with types of chronic pain management.
Keywords: Multimorbidity, chronic pain, multimodal, opioid, pain management
Introduction
Chronic pain, defined as pain lasting ≥ 3 months, is associated with many chronic conditions 1 and is the source of significant morbidity in the United States. 2 Approximately 20% of adults experience chronic pain, and 7% experience high-impact chronic pain, which may lead to adverse outcomes such as decreased quality of life, poor mental health, and decreased physical function. 3 Chronic pain is also associated with a considerable economic burden estimated at $560 billion annually in direct medical costs, lost productivity, and disability programs. 4
Multimorbidity, characterized by the concurrent presence of two or more chronic conditions, is a global concern that affects both working- age and older individuals, with its prevalence increasing with age. 5 Like chronic pain, multimorbidity is associated with adverse health outcomes, often resulting in a decline in physiological function, decreased quality of life, and increased healthcare utilization. 6 Multimorbidity and chronic pain are two major global health issues that unfortunately often co-exist, especially with an aging population in the United States, as nearly one-third of elderly patients with multimorbidity take analgesics regularly or as needed. 7 Furthermore, a higher percentage of adults with multimorbidity report chronic pain compared to those without multimorbidity. 8 The incidence of chronic pain appears to be proportional to the number of long-term conditions (LTC). McQueenie et al. revealed that in individuals who reported chronic pain, 53.4% had 2-3 LTC, and 71.5% had ≥ 4 LTC, twice and four times more than those with no LTC, respectively. 8
Despite the misuse of opioids amongst the general population resulting in severe clinical outcomes (eg respiratory depression and death), 9 opioids have been used broadly in treating chronic pain. In addition, their long-term benefits remain uncertain. Regulatory agencies and the public have called for a change in opioid prescribing practices due to the general unfavorable risk-to-benefit ratio of chronic opioid therapy. Because of the complex nature of chronic pain, monotherapy is rarely an adequate strategy for pain management; therefore, guidelines have emphasized a multimodal approach to pain management that considers biologic, psychological, and social characteristics. 3 Multimodal analgesia optimizes pain relief by treating pain along different pain processing pathways, often resulting in a synergistic effect. It includes pharmacologic (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, acetaminophen, local anesthetics, opioids, adjuvant anesthetics), and nonpharmacologic interventions (interventional treatments, cognitive behavioral therapies, acupuncture, physical therapy, massage therapy, etc.). 10 For the management of chronic pain, The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that clinicians maximize the use of non-opioid therapies and consider initiating opioid therapy only if the expected benefits for pain and function are anticipated to outweigh the risks. 3 A multimodal approach to pain management is the ideal strategy to help reduce the dependence on a single medication and may reduce or eliminate the need for opioids. Studies have shown that multimodal pharmacologic approaches without the use of opioids may be just as effective as the use of opioid therapy for pain control among individuals with chronic pain conditions. For example, Krebs et al studied the effects of opioid vs non-opioid medications on pain-related function in patients with chronic back pain or hip/knee osteoarthritis pain. They found that treatment with opioids was not superior to treatment with a combination of non-opioid medications over 12 months. 11
In a study conducted by Rajbhandari-Thapa et al., multimorbidity was shown to account for more than 90% of opioid-related hospitalizations. However, the study did not distinguish between illicit or prescribed opioid therapy. Nevertheless, this indicates the need for alternatives to opioid prescriptions for pain control among individuals with multiple chronic conditions. 12 At present, studies assessing pain management strategies in individuals with multimorbidity are sparse; therefore, the main objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of types of pain treatment and analyze their associations with multimorbidity using a US nationally representative survey.
Methods
Study design and data sources
We used a cross-sectional design and analyzed data on adults aged 18 or older with chronic pain and chronic conditions from the 2020 National Health Interview Study (NHIS) Survey. The participants who reported pain on some days, most days, and every day in the past 3 months were considered to have chronic pain. We excluded individuals who 1) received opioids for acute pain, ascertained through direct inquiry in the NHIS survey regarding opioid usage specifically for acute pain, 2) had a concurrent diagnosis of cancer or pregnancy, and 3) did not report pain. We also restricted the study sample to adults without missing data on health insurance status, opioid use, or sex.
Measures
Dependent variables
The study participants were grouped into four chronic pain treatment categories: 1) opioid therapy, 2) non-opioid multimodal pain treatment, 3) non-opioid monotherapy, and 4) no pain treatment. Multimodal pain treatment was defined as adults using >1 of the following strategies for pain management: over-the-counter analgesics, opioid therapy, mindfulness therapies (yoga, Tai Chi, Qi Gong, meditation, guided imagery, relaxation techniques, cognitive behavioral therapy), and physical therapies (exercise, massage, physical therapy, rehabilitative therapy, occupation therapy, chiropractic care).
1. Opioid therapy: adults who used opioid therapy in the past three months with or without multimodal pain treatment.
2. Non-opioid multimodal pain treatment: adults who used non-opioid multimodal pain treatments in the past three months.
3. Non-opioid monotherapy: adults who used only one of the following strategies in the past three months for pain management: over-the-counter analgesics, mindfulness therapies (yoga, Tai Chi, Qi Gong, meditation, guided imagery, relaxation techniques, cognitive behavioral therapy), physical therapies (exercise, massage, physical therapy, rehabilitative therapy, occupation therapy, chiropractic care)
4. No pain treatment: adults who did not use pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic treatments for the management of their pain.
Key independent variable: Multimorbidity (Yes/No)
We defined multimorbidity as the co-occurrence of two or more chronic conditions in a single individual. 13 Multimorbidity was measured with an indicator variable (1 representing the presence of multimorbidity and 0 representing no multimorbidity). Adults with two or more conditions from a list of 14 commonly prevalent conditions (asthma, arthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, dementia, heart disease, hepatitis, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, chronic liver disease, stroke, anxiety, depression) were classified as having multimorbidity. These conditions were derived from the priority list of conditions for multimorbidity management. 14
Other explanatory variables
For adjusted analyses, we controlled for biological factors, social determinants of health, clinical factors, and lifestyle factors. Biological factors included: sex (male/female); age in years (18-39, 40-49, 50-59, 59-64, 65-74, 75 and older); and race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic/Latino, Other). Social determinants of health included: education (less than high school, high school, some college, college); health insurance status (yes, no); poverty relative to the federal poverty line (FPL) for NHIS (<100% FPL, 100-200% FPL, 200-400% FPL, >400% FPL); food security (yes, no); delayed medical care due to cost (yes, no); marital status (married divorced/separated, widowed, and never married); region (Northeast, Midwest, South, and West); and metro status (Large metro, large fringe, medium-small, and non-metro). The clinical factor included pain intensity (little, a lot, and between little and lot and multimorbidity). Lastly, lifestyle factors included body mass index categories (underweight, normal weight, overweight, obese); smoking status (current smoker, former smoker, and never smoked); and alcohol use (heavy alcohol use, not heavy, no drink during the past 12 months, and abstained). We included missing data from independent variables.
Statistical analyses
To account for the complex survey design of the NHIS, we used SAS survey procedures with clustering, strata, and weights. 13 We used Rao-Scott chi-square tests to analyze statistically significant group differences in chronic pain treatment by multimorbidity status. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regressions to determine the association between multimorbidity and different chronic pain treatments with the adjustment of individuals’ biological, SDoH, and clinical factors. In these regressions, the reference category for the dependent variable was “non-opioid monotherapy.”
Results
15,832 participants met the inclusion criteria for the study out of a total number of 31,568 adults. Once exclusion criteria were applied, the analytical sample consisted of 12,028 adults, which represents about 89,670,893 adults. In our study, 53.8% were female, and 66.7% were non-Hispanic White. As seen in Table 1, approximately 61 million adults reported having multimorbidity (unweighted N = 8,568, weighted % = 68.0). 54.8% had a college education, and 38.2% had income greater than or equal to 400% of the Federal Poverty Level (PVL). One in 5 adults (19.1%) reported experiencing a lot of pain, and 41.8% experienced moderate pain. The most common non-pharmacologic pain treatment was exercise (57.5%), followed by mind-body therapies (20.6%) and massage (15.5%). (For details, please see Appendix 1). When analyzing the weighted percentage of different pain treatments, 7.3% used opioid therapy, 57.1% used multimodal pain treatments without opioids, 29.2% used monotherapy for pain treatment, and 6.4% did not use any pain treatment (Appendix 1).
Table 1.
Description of Adults (Age ≥ 18 years) by Multimorbidity Status With Chronic Conditions and without Cancer National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
| ALL | Multimorbidity | No Multimorbidity | Chisq | Prob | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Row Wt % | N | Row Wt% | |||
| 8,568 | 68.0 | 3,460 | 32.0 | |||
| Sex | 37.395 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Female | 5,025 | 71.4 | 1,770 | 28.6 | ||
| Male | 3,543 | 64.0 | 1,690 | 36.0 | ||
| Race and Ethnicity | 21.253 | < 0.001 | ||||
| White | 6,267 | 69.7 | 2,425 | 30.3 | ||
| African American | 1,027 | 67.1 | 377 | 32.9 | ||
| Latino | 764 | 61.9 | 401 | 38.1 | ||
| Other race | 510 | 64.8 | 257 | 35.2 | ||
| Age (in Years) | 467.742 | < 0.001 | ||||
| 18-39 | 1,171 | 53.7 | 958 | 46.3 | ||
| 40-49 | 934 | 59.0 | 628 | 41.0 | ||
| 50-59 | 1,567 | 67.7 | 736 | 32.3 | ||
| 60-64 | 1,128 | 76.1 | 357 | 23.9 | ||
| 65-74 | 2,189 | 81.3 | 508 | 18.7 | ||
| 75,+ | 1,579 | 85.3 | 273 | 14.7 | ||
| Marital Status | 113.716 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Married | 4,124 | 66.2 | 1,979 | 33.8 | ||
| Divorced/Separated | 1,700 | 75.0 | 519 | 25.0 | ||
| Widowed | 1,293 | 83.2 | 247 | 16.8 | ||
| Never Married | 1,299 | 61.5 | 669 | 38.5 | ||
| Education | 72.56 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Less than HS | 592 | 76.1 | 140 | 23.9 | ||
| High School (HS) | 1,866 | 75.4 | 532 | 24.6 | ||
| Some College | 1,406 | 69.0 | 502 | 31.0 | ||
| College | 4,688 | 63.8 | 2,282 | 36.2 | ||
| Poverty Status (in FPL) | 80.731 | < 0.001 | ||||
| < 100% | 1,064 | 78.4 | 227 | 21.6 | ||
| 100 - <200% | 1,738 | 74.1 | 486 | 25.9 | ||
| 200 - <400% | 2,598 | 66.9 | 1,054 | 33.1 | ||
| >= 400% | 3,168 | 62.7 | 1,693 | 37.3 | ||
| Food Security | 49.504 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Food Secure | 7,501 | 66.4 | 3,223 | 33.6 | ||
| Food Insecure | 888 | 80.9 | 178 | 19.1 | ||
| Health Insurance | 15.698 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Health Insurance | 8,153 | 68.8 | 3,173 | 31.2 | ||
| No Health Insurance | 415 | 59.5 | 287 | 40.5 | ||
| Pain (last 3 months) | 215.959 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Little | 3,047 | 59.4 | 1,777 | 40.6 | ||
| Moderate | 3,667 | 69.9 | 1,320 | 30.1 | ||
| A lot | 1,854 | 81.4 | 363 | 18.6 | ||
| Opioid use | 87.476 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Opioid 3 months use | 801 | 86.0 | 115 | 14.0 | ||
| No 3 months use | 7,767 | 66.6 | 3,345 | 33.4 | ||
| Inpatient (IP) Visit | 84.721 | < 0.001 | ||||
| IP use past 12 months | 1,117 | 83.3 | 198 | 16.7 | ||
| No IP use | 7,447 | 66.2 | 3,262 | 33.8 | ||
| Healthcare Delay | 16.333 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Delayed due to $ | 790 | 75.2 | 236 | 24.8 | ||
| No delay | 7,776 | 67.2 | 3,224 | 32.8 | ||
| Pain (last 3 months) | 215.959 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Little | 3,047 | 59.4 | 1,777 | 40.6 | ||
| Moderate | 3,667 | 69.9 | 1,320 | 30.1 | ||
| A lot | 1,854 | 81.4 | 363 | 18.6 | ||
| Body Mass Index | 111.319 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Underweight | 113 | 70.1 | 48 | 29.9 | ||
| Normal | 1,891 | 60.0 | 1,030 | 40.0 | ||
| Overweight | 2,673 | 65.5 | 1,239 | 34.5 | ||
| Obese | 3,693 | 74.1 | 1,080 | 25.9 | ||
| Smoking Status | 89.632 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Current Smoker | 1,316 | 72.7 | 436 | 27.3 | ||
| Former Smoker | 2,750 | 75.5 | 815 | 24.5 | ||
| Never Smoked | 4,453 | 63.1 | 2,199 | 36.9 | ||
| Alcohol Consumption | 79.703 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Heavy Alcohol | 1,593 | 61.2 | 937 | 38.8 | ||
| No heavy alcohol | 3,808 | 67.0 | 1,641 | 33.0 | ||
| Not drinking from past 12months | 2,238 | 76.6 | 557 | 23.4 | ||
| Abstain | 812 | 67.9 | 296 | 32.1 | ||
| Region | 26.326 | < 0.001 | ||||
| Northeast | 1,495 | 70.6 | 549 | 29.4 | ||
| Midwest | 2,068 | 67.1 | 809 | 32.9 | ||
| South | 3,117 | 70.0 | 1,177 | 30.0 | ||
| West | 1,888 | 63.3 | 925 | 36.7 | ||
| Metro | 21.394 | |||||
| Large Central Metro | 2,276 | 65.5 | 992 | 34.5 | ||
| Large Fringe Metro | 1,843 | 66.1 | 832 | 33.9 | ||
| Medium and Small | 2,868 | 69.0 | 1,123 | 31.0 | ||
| Nonmetropolitan | 1,581 | 73.1 | 513 | 26.9 | ||
Based on 12,028 participants aged 18 or older, who reported pain during the past three months, had any of the following chronic conditions (asthma, arthritis, cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dementia, heart diseases, high cholesterol, hypertension, liver conditions, stroke, anxiety, and depression) and no cancer, used opioids for chronic pain, and without missing data in the type of pain treatment and opioid use. Missing data for marital status, education, food security, inpatient visits, healthcare delay, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol use are not presented. Rao-Scott Chi-squared test was used to determine significant group differences by multimorbidity status.
CBT: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; FPL- Federal Poverty Level; Prob: Chi-square probability; Tx: Treatment; Wt: Weighted.
As described in Table 2, We observed statistically significant differences in types of pain treatment by multimorbidity status. For example, more adults with multimorbidity were in the opioid therapy group (9.2% vs 3.2%) compared to those without multimorbidity. Individuals with multimorbidity were less likely to use non-opioid multimodal treatment (56.8% vs 58.9%) and treat their pain with monotherapy (28.5 vs 30.7%). Adults with multimorbidity were less likely to have no pain treatment (6.1% vs 7.2%). However, in unadjusted multinomial regression with “non-opioid monotherapy” as the reference group, there was no significant association of multimorbidity with non-opioid multimodal therapy or no pain treatment.
Table 2.
Description of Adults (Age ≥ 18 years) by Types of Pain Treatment National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
| ALL | Opioid TX. | Non-Opioid MM. TX. | Non-opioid Monotherapy | No pain TX. | Chisq | Prob | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Row Wt. % | N | Row Wt .% | N | Row Wt. % | N | Row Wt. % | |||
| 916 | 7.3 | 7,016 | 57.1 | 3,329 | 29.2 | 767 | 6.4 | |||
| Multimorbidity | 78.252 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Yes | 801 | 9.2 | 4,911 | 56.2 | 2,330 | 28.5 | 526 | 6.1 | ||
| No | 115 | 3.2 | 2,105 | 58.9 | 999 | 30.7 | 241 | 7.2 | ||
| Sex | 65.198 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Female | 555 | 8.0 | 4,192 | 60.0 | 1,704 | 27.0 | 344 | 5.0 | ||
| Male | 361 | 6.4 | 2,824 | 53.6 | 1,625 | 31.9 | 423 | 8.1 | ||
| Race and Ethnicity | 61.303 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| White | 666 | 7.4 | 5,167 | 58.9 | 2,367 | 28.2 | 492 | 5.5 | ||
| African American | 127 | 7.9 | 697 | 47.8 | 442 | 33.9 | 138 | 10.4 | ||
| Latino | 82 | 7.0 | 663 | 53.3 | 330 | 32.3 | 90 | 7.3 | ||
| Other race | 41 | 5.4 | 489 | 63.3 | 190 | 25.0 | 47 | 6.4 | ||
| Age (in Years) | 166.417 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| 18-39 | 60 | 3.1 | 1,444 | 64.0 | 523 | 27.3 | 102 | 5.7 | ||
| 40-49 | 92 | 5.4 | 1,001 | 60.4 | 399 | 28.8 | 70 | 5.3 | ||
| 50-59 | 215 | 10.5 | 1,365 | 57.0 | 597 | 27.3 | 126 | 5.1 | ||
| 60-64 | 158 | 10.3 | 831 | 53.7 | 399 | 28.7 | 97 | 7.3 | ||
| 65-74 | 236 | 8.6 | 1,485 | 52.6 | 775 | 31.0 | 201 | 7.8 | ||
| 75,+ | 155 | 8.3 | 890 | 46.6 | 636 | 35.9 | 171 | 9.1 | ||
| Marital Status | 112.645 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Married | 398 | 6.7 | 3,722 | 58.6 | 1,668 | 29.4 | 315 | 5.3 | ||
| Divorced/Separated | 215 | 10.3 | 1,258 | 54.9 | 598 | 28.6 | 148 | 6.3 | ||
| Widowed | 156 | 11.4 | 734 | 43.2 | 504 | 34.9 | 146 | 10.6 | ||
| Never married | 126 | 5.0 | 1,196 | 59.6 | 510 | 27.1 | 136 | 8.3 | ||
| Education | 233.62 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Less than HS | 93 | 13.0 | 305 | 41.0 | 260 | 36.7 | 74 | 9.4 | ||
| High School | 238 | 9.7 | 1,096 | 45.2 | 835 | 35.5 | 229 | 9.7 | ||
| Some College | 183 | 8.1 | 1,047 | 54.1 | 554 | 31.6 | 124 | 6.2 | ||
| College | 402 | 5.5 | 4,556 | 64.5 | 1,672 | 25.1 | 340 | 4.9 | ||
| Poverty Status (in FPL) | 161.81 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| < 100% | 175 | 12.8 | 627 | 46.7 | 368 | 31.8 | 121 | 8.7 | ||
| 100 - <200% | 244 | 9.6 | 1,127 | 50.6 | 688 | 31.9 | 165 | 7.9 | ||
| 200 - <400% | 291 | 7.5 | 2,069 | 55.4 | 1,042 | 30.3 | 250 | 6.7 | ||
| >= 400% | 206 | 4.3 | 3,193 | 64.7 | 1,231 | 26.2 | 231 | 4.8 | ||
| Food Security | 39.196 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Food Secure | 729 | 6.6 | 6,322 | 57.6 | 3,003 | 29.5 | 670 | 6.4 | ||
| Food Insecure | 166 | 13.0 | 565 | 52.6 | 259 | 27.8 | 76 | 6.7 | ||
| Health Insurance | 23.619 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Health Insurance | 892 | 7.7 | 6,619 | 57.3 | 3,092 | 28.6 | 723 | 6.4 | ||
| No Health Insurance | 24 | 2.8 | 397 | 54.6 | 237 | 36.3 | 44 | 6.2 | ||
| Pain (last 3 months) | 521.187 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Little | 58 | 1.1 | 2,829 | 56.8 | 1,550 | 34.0 | 387 | 8.1 | ||
| Moderate | 406 | 7.3 | 3,088 | 61.0 | 1,250 | 26.8 | 243 | 4.9 | ||
| A lot | 452 | 20.0 | 1,099 | 49.0 | 529 | 24.8 | 137 | 6.2 | ||
| Inpatient (IP) Visit | 69.031 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| IP use past 12 months | 201 | 14.5 | 701 | 51.9 | 331 | 26.7 | 82 | 6.9 | ||
| No IP use | 713 | 6.4 | 6,315 | 57.7 | 2,996 | 29.5 | 685 | 6.4 | ||
| Healthcare Delay | 18.414 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Delayed due to $ | 100 | 8.3 | 644 | 63.4 | 239 | 24.3 | 43 | 4.1 | ||
| No delay | 816 | 7.2 | 6,370 | 56.3 | 3,090 | 29.8 | 724 | 6.7 | ||
| Body Mass Index | 65.052 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Underweight | 26 | 18.8 | 73 | 44.5 | 48 | 31.1 | 14 | 5.6 | ||
| Normal | 180 | 5.7 | 1,776 | 61.1 | 761 | 25.9 | 204 | 7.3 | ||
| Overweight | 250 | 6.2 | 2,337 | 57.8 | 1,081 | 29.8 | 244 | 6.2 | ||
| Obese | 442 | 8.7 | 2,690 | 54.8 | 1,352 | 30.4 | 289 | 6.1 | ||
| Smoking Status | 95.274 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Current Smoker | 231 | 12.1 | 858 | 49.4 | 538 | 31.9 | 125 | 6.6 | ||
| Former Smoker | 302 | 9.0 | 2,062 | 57.0 | 993 | 28.2 | 208 | 5.8 | ||
| Never Smoked | 377 | 5.1 | 4,065 | 59.2 | 1,782 | 29.0 | 428 | 6.7 | ||
| Alcohol Consumption | 134.553 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Heavy Alcohol | 122 | 5.0 | 1,635 | 63.2 | 657 | 27.2 | 116 | 4.5 | ||
| No heavy alcohol | 357 | 6.6 | 3,343 | 59.5 | 1,432 | 27.8 | 317 | 6.0 | ||
| Not drinking from past 12months | 338 | 11.6 | 1,417 | 50.3 | 833 | 30.6 | 207 | 7.4 | ||
| Abstain | 85 | 5.9 | 554 | 48.6 | 361 | 36.1 | 108 | 9.5 | ||
| Region | 80.886 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Northeast | 112 | 5.1 | 1,256 | 60.7 | 539 | 27.5 | 137 | 6.7 | ||
| Midwest | 240 | 7.7 | 1,690 | 57.8 | 803 | 29.5 | 144 | 5.0 | ||
| South | 358 | 8.3 | 2,245 | 51.2 | 1,362 | 32.7 | 329 | 7.7 | ||
| West | 206 | 6.7 | 1,825 | 63.9 | 625 | 24.1 | 157 | 5.3 | ||
| Metro | 52.279 | < 0.001 | ||||||||
| Large Central Metro | 212 | 5.7 | 2,100 | 62.8 | 782 | 25.6 | 174 | 5.9 | ||
| Large Fringe Metro | 184 | 6.5 | 1,595 | 58.0 | 727 | 29.0 | 169 | 6.5 | ||
| Medium and Small | 318 | 8.0 | 2,235 | 54.3 | 1,176 | 31.4 | 262 | 6.2 | ||
| Nonmetropolitan | 202 | 9.9 | 1,086 | 50.8 | 644 | 31.7 | 162 | 7.6 | ||
Note: Based on 12,028 participants aged 18 or older, who reported pain during the past three months, had any of the following chronic conditions (asthma, arthritis, cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dementia, heart diseases, high cholesterol, hypertension, liver conditions, stroke, anxiety, and depression) and no cancer, used opioids for chronic pain, and without missing data in the type of pain treatment and opioid use. Missing data for marital status, education, food security, inpatient visits, healthcare delay, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol use are not presented.
FPL- Federal Poverty Level; MM: Multimodal; TX. Treatment; Wt: Weighted.
Regarding types of pain treatment (Table 2), the lowest percentages of opioid therapy were observed among individuals that were college educated (5.5%), food secure (6.6%), high income (4.3%, defined as ≥ 400% FPL), and youngest age (3.1%). The highest percentages of opioid therapy were observed in adults with less than high school education (13.0%), low income (12.8%, defined as less than 100% FPL), and food insecure (13.0%). Similarly, the lowest percentages of non-opioid multimodal pain treatment were observed in low education (41.0%), food insecure (52.6%), and low-income groups (46.7%), and the highest percentages of non-opioid multimodal pain treatment were observed in college-educated (64.5%), food secure (57.6%), and high-income groups (64.7%). Adults with health insurance had higher rates of opioid use (7.7% vs 2.8%) and higher rates of non-opioid multimodal pain treatment (57.3% vs 54.6%) compared to those without health insurance. Severe pain was associated with higher rates of opioid use (20% vs 1.1%) compared to those with little pain. Those with severe pain had lower rates of non-opioid multimodal pain treatment (49.0% vs 56.8%) compared to those with little pain.
In adjusted analysis (Table 3), using “non-opioid monotherapy” as the reference group, those with multimorbidity had higher odds of opioid therapy (AOR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.23, 2.17) and non-opioid multimodal treatment (AOR = 1.15, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.31) compared to adults without multimorbidity.
Table 3.
Adjusted Odds Ratios (AOR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) from Multinomial Logistic Regression on Type of Pain Treatment Reference Group for Type of Pain Treatment = Non-opioid Monotherapy National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
| Opioid TX. | Non-Opioid MM. TX | No Pain TX | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AOR | 95%CI | Sig | AOR | 95%CI | Sig | AOR | 95%CI | Sig | |
| Multimorbidity | |||||||||
| Yes | 1.63 | [ 1.23, 2.17] | *** | 1.15 | [ 1.01, 1.31] | * | 0.84 | [ 0.67, 1.06] | |
| No (Ref) | |||||||||
| Sex | |||||||||
| Female | 1.29 | [ 1.05, 1.59] | * | 1.47 | [ 1.30, 1.65] | *** | 0.64 | [ 0.51, 0.80] | *** |
| Male (Ref) | |||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity | |||||||||
| White (Ref) | |||||||||
| African American | 0.75 | [ 0.55, 1.02] | 0.75 | [ 0.62, 0.90] | ** | 1.37 | [ 1.00, 1.87] | * | |
| Latino | 0.90 | [ 0.61, 1.33] | 0.80 | [ 0.66, 0.97] | * | 1.16 | [ 0.82, 1.64] | ||
| Other race | 0.83 | [ 0.49, 1.42] | 1.12 | [ 0.87, 1.44] | 1.16 | [ 0.75, 1.80] | |||
| Age (in Years) | |||||||||
| 18-39 (Ref) | |||||||||
| 40-49 | 1.41 | [ 0.92, 2.16] | 0.89 | [ 0.74, 1.08] | 1.09 | [ 0.72, 1.66] | |||
| 50-59 | 2.74 | [ 1.84, 4.09] | *** | 0.91 | [ 0.75, 1.10] | 1.09 | [ 0.74, 1.59] | ||
| 60-64 | 2.38 | [ 1.58, 3.57] | *** | 0.84 | [ 0.68, 1.04] | 1.46 | [ 0.97, 2.19] | ||
| 65-74 | 1.85 | [ 1.24, 2.75] | ** | 0.74 | [ 0.61, 0.89] | ** | 1.46 | [ 0.98, 2.16] | |
| 75,+ | 1.52 | [ 0.95, 2.45] | 0.61 | [ 0.49, 0.77] | *** | 1.25 | [ 0.84, 1.88] | ||
| Marital Status | |||||||||
| Married (Ref) | |||||||||
| Divorced/Separated | 1.08 | [ 0.82, 1.41] | 1.13 | [ 0.96, 1.32] | 1.14 | [ 0.84, 1.54] | |||
| Widowed | 1.02 | [ 0.73, 1.44] | 0.85 | [ 0.70, 1.04] | 1.54 | [ 1.10, 2.16] | * | ||
| Never married | 1.03 | [ 0.75, 1.43] | 1.17 | [ 0.98, 1.40] | 1.66 | [ 1.20, 2.31] | ** | ||
| Education | |||||||||
| Less than HS | 0.92 | [ 0.61, 1.38] | 0.57 | [ 0.44, 0.73] | *** | 1.05 | [ 0.70, 1.58] | ||
| High School | 0.76 | [ 0.58, 1.00] | 0.55 | [ 0.47, 0.65] | *** | 1.25 | [ 0.96, 1.64] | ||
| Some College | 0.93 | [ 0.71, 1.23] | 0.70 | [ 0.59, 0.83] | *** | 0.95 | [ 0.70, 1.30] | ||
| College | |||||||||
| Poverty Status (in FPL) | |||||||||
| < 100% | 1.29 | [ 0.88, 1.91] | 0.80 | [ 0.63, 1.01] | 1.27 | [ 0.83, 1.95] | |||
| 100 - <200% | 1.21 | [ 0.88, 1.66] | 0.88 | [ 0.73, 1.05] | 1.19 | [ 0.87, 1.64] | |||
| 200 - <400% | 1.28 | [ 0.97, 1.69] | 0.87 | [ 0.76, 0.99] | * | 1.16 | [ 0.89, 1.51] | ||
| >= 400% (Ref) | |||||||||
| Food Security | |||||||||
| Food Secure (Ref) | |||||||||
| Food insecurity | 1.24 | [ 0.90, 1.70] | 1.14 | [ 0.91, 1.43] | 1.03 | [ 0.71, 1.50] | |||
| Health Insurance | |||||||||
| Yes (Ref) | |||||||||
| No Health Insurance | 0.27 | [ 0.15, 0.49] | *** | 0.78 | [ 0.62, 0.98] | * | 0.72 | [ 0.44, 1.18] | |
| Pain (last 3 months) | |||||||||
| Little (Ref) | |||||||||
| Moderate | 7.26 | [ 5.15, 10.24] | *** | 1.43 | [ 1.25, 1.64] | *** | 0.77 | [ 0.60, 0.99] | * |
| A lot | 19.36 | [13.35,28.06] | *** | 1.33 | [ 1.12, 1.58] | ** | 0.99 | [ 0.74, 1.33] | |
| In-Patient (IP) Visit | |||||||||
| IP use past 12 months | 1.67 | [ 1.27, 2.19] | *** | 1.06 | [ 0.89, 1.27] | 1.16 | [ 0.81, 1.66] | ||
| No IP use (Ref) | |||||||||
| Healthcare Delay | |||||||||
| Delayed due to Cost | 1.24 | [ 0.87, 1.79] | 1.42 | [ 1.13, 1.79] | ** | 0.89 | [ 0.56, 1.42] | ||
| No delay (Ref) | |||||||||
| Body Mass Index | |||||||||
| Underweight | 2.13 | [ 1.11, 4.09] | * | 0.62 | [ 0.39, 0.99] | * | 0.72 | [ 0.34, 1.52] | |
| Normal (Ref) | |||||||||
| Overweight | 0.93 | [ 0.70, 1.24] | 0.91 | [ 0.79, 1.06] | 0.72 | [ 0.55, 0.96] | * | ||
| Obese | 1.01 | [ 0.77, 1.32] | 0.80 | [ 0.69, 0.92] | ** | 0.73 | [ 0.56, 0.96] | * | |
| Smoking Status | |||||||||
| Current Smoker | 1.40 | [ 1.06, 1.86] | * | 0.77 | [ 0.65, 0.92] | ** | 0.86 | [ 0.63, 1.18] | |
| Former Smoker | 1.44 | [ 1.13, 1.82] | ** | 1.05 | [ 0.93, 1.19] | 0.88 | [ 0.69, 1.13] | ||
| Never Smoked (Ref) | |||||||||
| Alcohol Consumption | |||||||||
| Heavy Alcohol | 1.27 | [ 0.82, 1.98] | 1.50 | [ 1.16, 1.93] | ** | 0.77 | [ 0.52, 1.14] | ||
| No heavy alcohol | 1.52 | [ 1.03, 2.23] | * | 1.40 | [ 1.12, 1.77] | ** | 0.98 | [ 0.69, 1.39] | |
| Not drinking past 12months | 1.70 | [ 1.16, 2.50] | ** | 1.27 | [ 1.00, 1.61] | * | 0.99 | [ 0.69, 1.42] | |
| Abstain (Ref) | |||||||||
| Region | |||||||||
| Northeast (Ref) | |||||||||
| Midwest | 1.53 | [ 1.08, 2.15] | * | 0.90 | [ 0.75, 1.08] | 0.76 | [ 0.53, 1.10] | ||
| South | 1.45 | [ 1.05, 1.98] | * | 0.79 | [ 0.67, 0.93] | ** | 0.96 | [ 0.69, 1.33] | |
| West | 1.74 | [ 1.26, 2.42] | *** | 1.17 | [ 0.96, 1.43] | 0.97 | [ 0.67, 1.39] | ||
| Metro | |||||||||
| Large Central Metro | 0.96 | [ 0.66, 1.40] | 1.27 | [ 1.03, 1.57] | * | 0.86 | [ 0.61, 1.20] | ||
| Large Fringe Metro | 0.94 | [ 0.65, 1.37] | 1.02 | [ 0.83, 1.26] | 0.93 | [ 0.67, 1.29] | |||
| Medium and Small | 0.92 | [ 0.66, 1.30] | 0.92 | [ 0.75, 1.13] | 0.82 | [ 0.60, 1.10] | |||
| Nonmetropolitan (Ref) | |||||||||
Note: Based on 12,028 participants aged 18 or older, who reported pain during the past three months, had any of the following chronic conditions (asthma, arthritis, cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dementia, heart diseases, high cholesterol, hypertension, liver conditions, stroke, anxiety, and depression) and no cancer, used opioids for chronic pain, and without missing data in the type of pain treatment and opioid use. Missing indicators were included for marital status, education, food security, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol use (data not presented).
FPL- Federal Poverty Level; MM: Multimodal; Ref: Reference Group TX. Treatment; Wt: Weighted;
***p < 0.001; ** 0.001 ≤ p < .01; * 0.01 ≤ p < .05.
In general, those with severe pain had higher odds of opioid therapy (AOR=19.36, 95% CI=13.35, 28.06) than those with little pain. Adults with less than high school (AOR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.44, 0.73) and high school (AOR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.47, 0.65) had lower odds of non-opioid multimodal treatment compared to those with a college education. Regarding health insurance, adults without health insurance had lower odds of opioid therapy (AOR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.15, 0.49) and non-opioid multimodal treatment (AOR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62, 0.98) compared to those with health insurance.
Discussion
In our study, which was restricted to those with chronic pain, 68% had multimorbidity, surpassing the 27% reported for the general population of 2018 NHIS respondents. 15 Study findings suggest that multimorbidity incidence for adults with chronic pain is higher than in the general population. Since it is well-studied that multimorbidity and chronic pain can independently lead to decreased quality of life, higher economic burden, and higher mortality,2,16 improving health outcomes in situations where multimorbidity and chronic pain co-exist is paramount. Butchart et al noted that patients with chronic pain and other chronic health conditions were more likely to have poorer self-rated health, lower functional status, and lower overall ratings of quality of care. 17 Approaches found to improve health outcomes among individuals with multimorbidity in the primary care and community settings include organizational interventions (eg focus on risk factor management in commonly co-occurring conditions) and patient-centered interventions (eg focusing on functional improvement). 18
In our study, those with multimorbidity were also more likely to rely on opioids as part of their pain management strategy despite adjusting for pain severity. Multimodal approaches that limit or eliminate the need for opioids in those with multiple chronic conditions are essential. Kaiser Permanente Colorado (KPCO) is an example of an integrated healthcare delivery system with a multidisciplinary pain management clinic composed of physicians specializing in pain management, psychologists, counselors, nurses, and social workers. 19 At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, Gersch et al compared the effectiveness of pain control from an expert multidisciplinary telemonitoring service team vs. the usual care team (defined as a clinical pharmacy specialist and primary care physician) at KPCO for patients receiving ≥30MME/day. 20 Though the multidisciplinary team’s services were virtual, their telemonitoring services were associated with significant decreases in MME compared to the usual care group. 20
When opioids are needed for pain management, patients should receive close monitoring and education regarding appropriate use, awareness of alternative therapies, and safe disposal of opioids. In addition, increasing naloxone (an opioid antagonist) prescribing rates has been shown to prevent opioid-related overdose. 21 Those with multimorbidity may benefit from these interventions as they may have higher risks of opioid-related hospitalizations. 12
Adults with multimorbidity also reported a higher incidence of severe pain than those without. Similar to the report from Ferguson et al, our study also showed that multimorbidity increased the prevalence and intensity of reported pain. 22 Co-morbid conditions, including depression and anxiety, could also lead to increased pain intensity, highlighting the importance of psychoeducational interventions in pain management. 22 Considering sociodemographic characteristics, individuals with a high school degree or less had lower odds of using non-opioid multimodal treatment than those with a college degree. Several studies have suggested that opioid users achieve lower levels of education. 23 The 2021 National Health Statistics Report on prescription opioid use revealed adults with less than a high school diploma or General Education Development Test (GED) were more likely to use opioid prescriptions (26.2%), followed by those with some college or an associate’s degree (23.5%), and adults with a bachelor’s degree or higher (18.4%). 24 In this study, social determinants such as lack of health insurance were also associated with lower odds of using non-opioid multimodal treatment. The full range of therapeutic options for managing pain has historically been inaccessible to many patients because of insufficient access to treatment modalities such as behavioral therapy. 3 Specific barriers identified for accessing non-pharmacologic treatment options for chronic pain include geographical limitations, health care system-related barriers (cost and reimbursement), and patient-related barriers (lack of knowledge/skepticism on the use of non-pharmacologic treatment). 25 Interventions such as telehealth and digitally delivered therapy for psychological interventions increased patient access and have yielded similar outcomes as traditional face-to-face psychological services for chronic pain control. 26 Chronic pain patient education has also been shown to improve self-management and self-efficacy in patients with chronic pain from any etiology. 27 Social determinants of health (SDoH) play a vital role in pain management, and patient-centered care focused on minimizing the disproportionate burden of pain in low-resource communities is crucial in optimizing pain care.
Regarding study strengths, we used a national representative data set with a large sample size to analyze a comprehensive list of factors associated with pain treatment strategies in adults with and without multimorbidity. Specifically, we analyzed the impact of SDoH on different pain treatments. Our study showed that despite multimorbidity status, SDoH factors such as education and income status were associated with lower odds of using multimodal pain treatment without opioids. There is a positive correlation between socioeconomic marginalization and opioid-related overdose, 28 and emphasis on multimodal treatment strategies without opioids may be beneficial for preventing opioid-related overdose in socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Patient-reported outcomes are also a strength of this study. Several previous studies reviewing pain management strategies for those with chronic pain have utilized claims data, which makes it difficult to account for commonly used over-the-counter medications or physical and psychoeducational interventions not covered by insurance. Our study accounted for the utilization of therapies not covered by insurance.
Our study has some notable limitations. First, this was a cross-sectional study design in which self-reported data is subject to recall bias. Secondly, NHIS 2020 data was collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 led to various treatment interruptions for chronic pain such as physical therapy and a change in prescribing patterns of opioid therapy. 29 Lee et al. noted that patients were more likely to receive higher doses of opioid therapy, and longer opioid prescriptions early in the pandemic. In addition, the proportion of patients receiving nonpharmacologic therapy was lower in the early pandemic period compared to 2019 highlighting the fact that despite decreased access to appointments during the early pandemic period, prescribers may have increased their levels of opioid prescribing in the absence of less risky non-pharmacologic alternatives. 30 Thirdly, due to COVID-19, there were significant changes to the NHIS interview procedures. Typically, NHIS data is collected as an in-person interview. During quarter 2 of the 2020 survey, NHIS temporarily became a telephone-only survey, which decreased household interview response rates (dropping from 60% in quarter 1 of 2020 to 42.7% in quarter 2). 31 NHIS also does not collect data on institutionalized patients, such as those in long-term facilities. These factors may have led to the under-reporting of multimorbidity and opioid utilization. To mitigate the low response rates seen with the telephone-only approach, NHIS has switched to a telephone-first approach. Household contacts will be contacted first via telephone, and personal visits reserved for those that did not respond. Lastly, we were unable to analyze the specific opioids utilized by study participants or the usage of prescribed medications, beyond opioids for pain management. This includes adjuvant analgesics such as anticonvulsants, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), as this data is not available in NHIS.
In conclusion, nearly 7 in 10 adults with chronic pain had multimorbidity. Those with multimorbidity were more likely to report severe pain and use opioids for pain management. This study adds to the limited body of evidence analyzing pain treatment approaches in those with multimorbidity who may be at higher risk for opioid-related harms.
Appendix.
Appendix 1. Description of Characteristics of Adults (Age ≥ 18 years) with Chronic Conditions and without Cancer National Health Interview Survey, 2020.
| ALL | N | Wt. N | Wt. % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12,028 | 89,670,892 | 100.0 | |
| Multimorbidity | |||
| Yes | 8,568 | 60,963,125 | 68.0 |
| No | 3,460 | 28,707,768 | 32.0 |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 6,795 | 48,273,685 | 53.8 |
| Male | 5,233 | 41,397,207 | 46.2 |
| Race and Ethnicity | |||
| White | 8,692 | 59,845,490 | 66.7 |
| African American | 1,404 | 11,519,469 | 12.8 |
| Latino/Hispanic | 1,165 | 11,662,916 | 13.0 |
| Other race | 767 | 6,643,017 | 7.4 |
| Age (in Years) | |||
| 18-39 Years | 2,129 | 22,957,559 | 25.6 |
| 40-49 Years | 1,562 | 13,378,828 | 14.9 |
| 50-59 Years | 2,303 | 18,170,789 | 20.3 |
| 60-64 Years | 1,485 | 10,058,360 | 11.2 |
| 65-74 Years | 2,697 | 15,352,796 | 17.1 |
| 75 Years or Older | 1,852 | 9,752,560 | 10.9 |
| Marital Status | |||
| Married | 6,103 | 53,353,725 | 59.5 |
| Divorced/Separated | 2,219 | 11,643,593 | 13.0 |
| Widowed | 1,540 | 7,329,705 | 8.2 |
| Never Married | 1,968 | 15,809,933 | 17.6 |
| Education | |||
| Less than HS | 732 | 5,786,613 | 6.5 |
| High School (HS) | 2,398 | 19,092,771 | 21.3 |
| Some College | 1,908 | 15,498,184 | 17.3 |
| College | 6,970 | 49,099,946 | 54.8 |
| Poverty Status (in FPL) | |||
| < 100% | 1,291 | 10,320,956 | 11.5 |
| 100 - <200% | 2,224 | 17,163,820 | 19.1 |
| 200 - <400% | 3,652 | 27,891,009 | 31.1 |
| >= 400% | 4,861 | 34,295,108 | 38.2 |
| Food Security | |||
| Food Secure | 10,724 | 78,364,840 | 87.4 |
| Food Insecurity | 1,066 | 9,287,442 | 10.4 |
| Health Insurance | |||
| Health Insurance | 11,326 | 82,111,330 | 91.6 |
| No Health Insurance | 702 | 7,559,563 | 8.4 |
| Pain (last 3 months) | |||
| Little | 4,824 | 35,105,023 | 39.1 |
| Moderate | 4,987 | 37,449,908 | 41.8 |
| A lot | 2,217 | 17,115,961 | 19.1 |
| Opioid use (last 3 months) | |||
| Yes | 916 | 6,531,162 | 7.3 |
| No | 11,112 | 83,139,730 | 92.7 |
| Inpatient (IP) Visit | |||
| IP use past 12 months | 1,315 | 9,420,631 | 10.5 |
| No IP use | 10,709 | 80,225,056 | 89.5 |
| Healthcare Delay | |||
| Delayed due to Cost | 1,026 | 8,954,484 | 10.0 |
| No delay | 11,000 | 80,700,855 | 90.0 |
| Body Mass Index | |||
| Underweight | 161 | 1,166,817 | 1.3 |
| Normal | 2,921 | 21,416,090 | 23.9 |
| Overweight | 3,912 | 28,048,304 | 31.3 |
| Obese | 4,773 | 37,228,142 | 41.5 |
| Smoking Status | |||
| Current Smoker | 1,752 | 14,103,945 | 15.7 |
| Former Smoker | 3,565 | 24,139,083 | 26.9 |
| Never Smoked | 6,652 | 50,932,640 | 56.8 |
| Alcohol Consumption | |||
| Heavy Alcohol | 2,530 | 20,320,718 | 22.7 |
| No heavy alcohol | 5,449 | 39,200,602 | 43.7 |
| Not drinking past 12months | 2,795 | 19,345,115 | 21.6 |
| Abstain | 1,108 | 9,588,645 | 10.7 |
| Region | |||
| Northeast | 2,044 | 14,839,934 | 16.5 |
| Midwest | 2,877 | 19,879,841 | 22.2 |
| South | 4,294 | 35,103,649 | 39.1 |
| West | 2,813 | 19,847,468 | 22.1 |
| Metro | |||
| Large Central Metro | 3,268 | 25,586,550 | 28.5 |
| Large Fringe Metro | 2,675 | 21,225,711 | 23.7 |
| Medium and Small | 3,991 | 28,199,451 | 31.4 |
| Nonmetropolitan | 2,094 | 14,659,180 | 16.3 |
| Type of Pain Treatment | |||
| Opioid use | 916 | 6,531,162 | 7.2 |
| Non-opioid MM Tx. | 7,016 | 51,155,925 | 57.1 |
| Non-opioid monotherapy | 3,329 | 26,226,612 | 29.2 |
| No pain treatment | 767 | 5,757,193 | 6.4 |
Notes: Based on 12,028 participants aged 18 or older reported pain during the past three months, with any of the following chronic conditions (asthma, arthritis, cancer, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, dementia, heart diseases, high cholesterol, hypertension, liver conditions, stroke, anxiety, and depression) and without cancer, using opioids for chronic pain, without missing data in the types of pain treatment and opioid use. Missing data for the following variables (marital status, education, food security, inpatient visits, healthcare delay, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol use) are not presented.
FPL: Federal Poverty Level; MM: Multimodal; Tx: Treatment; Wt. Weighted.
Footnotes
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities through the Texas Center for Health Disparities (NIMHD) [grant number 5U54MD006882-10].
IRB statement: The Office of Research Compliance / North Texas Regional Institutional Review Board has determined this project does not meet the definition of human subject research under the purview of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) according to federal regulations. Therefore, IRB review of this project is not required.
ORCID iD
Rolake A Neba https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7348-6369
References:
- 1.Leadley RM, Armstrong N, Lee YC, Allen A, Kleijnen J. Chronic diseases in the European Union: the prevalence and health cost implications of chronic pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. Dec 2012;26(4):310-325. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2012.736933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dydyk AM, Conermann T. Chronic Pain. StatPearls. 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Rikard SM, Strahan AE, Schmit KM, Guy GP, Jr. Chronic Pain Among Adults - United States, 2019-2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023;72(15):379-385. Published 2023 Apr 14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7215a1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya C, et al. Prevalence of Chronic Pain and High-Impact Chronic Pain Among Adults - United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. Sep 142018;67(36):1001-1006. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6736a2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Navickas R, Petric VK, Feigl AB, Seychell M. Multimorbidity: What do we know? What should we do? J Comorb. 2016;6(1):4-11. doi: 10.15256/joc.2016.6.72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ryan A, Wallace E, O’Hara P, Smith SM. Multimorbidity and functional decline in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. Oct 15 2015;13:168. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0355-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Scherer M, Hansen H, Gensichen J, et al. Association between multimorbidity patterns and chronic pain in elderly primary care patients: a cross-sectional observational study. BMC Fam Pract. Jun 6 2016;17:68. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0468-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McQueenie R, Jani BD, Siebert S, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain in LTCs and multimorbidity: A cross-sectional study using UK Biobank. J Multimorb Comorb. Jan-Dec 2021;11:26335565211005870. doi: 10.1177/26335565211005870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016. MMWR Recomm Rep. Mar 18 2016;65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manworren RC. Multimodal pain management and the future of a personalized medicine approach to pain. AORN J. Mar 2015;101(3):308-314; quiz 315-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2014.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Krebs EE, Gravely A, Nugent S, et al. Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Mar 6 2018;319(9):872-882. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rajbhandari-Thapa J, Zhang D, Padilla HM, Chung SR. Opioid-Related Hospitalization and Its Association With Chronic Diseases: Findings From the National Inpatient Sample, 2011-2015. Prev Chronic Dis. Nov 27 2019;16:E157. doi: 10.5888/pcd16.190169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Salive ME. Multimorbidity in older adults. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:75-83. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxs009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Goodman RA, Posner SF, Huang ES, Parekh AK, Koh HK. Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice. Prev Chronic Dis. Apr 25 2013;10:E66. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boersma P, Black LI, Ward BW. Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, 2018. Prev Chronic Dis. Sep 17 2020;17:E106. doi: 10.5888/pcd17.200130 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fortin M, Soubhi H, Hudon C, Bayliss EA, van den Akker M. Multimorbidity’s many challenges. BMJ. May 19 2007;334(7602):1016-1017. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39201.463819.2C [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Butchart A, Kerr EA, Heisler M, Piette JD, Krein SL. Experience and management of chronic pain among patients with other complex chronic conditions. Clin J Pain. May 2009;25(4):293-298. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31818bf574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Smith SM, Wallace E, O’Dowd T, Fortin M. Interventions for improving outcomes in patients with multimorbidity in primary care and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Mar 14 2016;3(3):CD006560. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006560.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Staff H. Pain Management Clinic. Kaiser Permanente. February 23, 2022. https://healthy.kaiserpermanente.org/health-wellness/health-encyclopedia/he.pain-management-clinic.tr3230 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gersch WD, Delate T, Bergquist KM, Smith K. Clinical Effectiveness of an Outpatient MMultidisciplinaryChronic Pain Management Telementoring Service. Clin J Pain. Oct 1 2021;37(10):740-746. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Phillips JK, Ford MA, Bonnie RJ, eds. Pain Management and the Opioid Epidemic: Balancing Societal and Individual Benefits and Risks of Prescription Opioid Use. 2017. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ferguson M, Svendrovski A, Katz J. Association Between Multimorbid Disease Patterns and Pain Outcomes Among a Complex Chronic Care Population in Canada. J Pain Res. 2020;13:3045-3057. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S269648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ellis MS, Kasper ZA, Cicero TJ. The impact of opioid use disorder on levels of educational attainment: Perceived benefits and consequences. Drug Alcohol Depend. Jan 1 2020;206:107618. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dahlhamer JM, Connor EM, Bose J, Lucas JL, Zelaya CE. Prescription Opioid Use Among Adults With Chronic Pain: United States, 2019. Natl Health Stat Report. Aug 2021;(162):1-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Becker WC, Dorflinger L, Edmond SN, Islam L, Heapy AA, Fraenkel L. Barriers and facilitators to use of non-pharmacological treatments in chronic pain. BMC Fam Pract. Mar 20 2017;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0608-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Heapy AA, Higgins DM, Goulet JL, et al. Interactive Voice Response-Based Self-management for Chronic Back Pain: The COPES Noninferiority Randomized Trial. JAMA Intern Med. Jun 1 2017;177(6):765-773. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Joypaul S, Kelly F, McMillan SS, King MA. MMultidisciplinarynterventions for chronic pain involving education: A systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.van Draanen J, Tsang C, Mitra S, Karamouzian M, Richardson L. Socioeconomic marginalization and opioid-related overdose: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend. Sep 1 2020;214:108127. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108127 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Rikin S, Perez HR, Zhang C, et al. Changes in Outpatient Opioid Prescribing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022;13:21501319221076926. doi: 10.1177/21501319221076926 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lee B, Yang K, Kaminski P, et al. Substitution of Nonpharmacologic Therapy With Opioid Prescribing for Pain During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2138453. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.James M, Dahlhamer MDB, Aaron M, Blumberg aSJ. Preliminary Evaluation of Nonresponse Bias Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic onNational Health Interview Survey Estimates, April-June 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2021. Accessed February 14 2021. [Google Scholar]
