Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 6;110(3 Suppl):56–65. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0399

Table 5.

Malaria Services and Data Quality Improvement client satisfaction survey results

Client response/supervisor appraisal Round 1, 2021 (n = 469), % Round 2, 2022 (n = 566), % Overall (n = 1,035), %
Received all tests ordered by the health-care provider at this facility 88 90 89
Told by health-care provider how to take the medicines received
 Yes 86 87 86
 Somewhat 8 9 9
Client could explain correctly the use of dispensed drugs at home*
 Yes 81 85 83
 Somewhat 12 13 12
Told how to use an ITN 84 88 86
Told by health-care provider when to return to the health facility 96 96 96
Client could explain correctly when to return to the health facility* 94 95 95
Wait time to get all RCH services
 <1 hour 44 37 40
 1–3 hours 49 54 52
 >3 hours 7 8 8
Satisfied with services provided by health facility staff
 Yes 87 89 89
 Somewhat 9 9 9
Satisfied with communication from health providers
 Yes 89 90 90
 Somewhat 7 7 7
Tested for malaria during the first antenatal care visit 96 (n = 296) 99 (n = 357) 98 (n = 653)

ITN = insecticide-treated net; RCH = reproductive and child health.

*

Response assessed by supervisor during Malaria Service and Data Quality Improvement supervision.

Subset of clients attending first antenatal care visit.