Table 5.
Client response/supervisor appraisal | Round 1, 2021 (n = 469), % | Round 2, 2022 (n = 566), % | Overall (n = 1,035), % |
---|---|---|---|
Received all tests ordered by the health-care provider at this facility | 88 | 90 | 89 |
Told by health-care provider how to take the medicines received | |||
Yes | 86 | 87 | 86 |
Somewhat | 8 | 9 | 9 |
Client could explain correctly the use of dispensed drugs at home* | |||
Yes | 81 | 85 | 83 |
Somewhat | 12 | 13 | 12 |
Told how to use an ITN | 84 | 88 | 86 |
Told by health-care provider when to return to the health facility | 96 | 96 | 96 |
Client could explain correctly when to return to the health facility* | 94 | 95 | 95 |
Wait time to get all RCH services | |||
<1 hour | 44 | 37 | 40 |
1–3 hours | 49 | 54 | 52 |
>3 hours | 7 | 8 | 8 |
Satisfied with services provided by health facility staff | |||
Yes | 87 | 89 | 89 |
Somewhat | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Satisfied with communication from health providers | |||
Yes | 89 | 90 | 90 |
Somewhat | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Tested for malaria during the first antenatal care visit† | 96 (n = 296) | 99 (n = 357) | 98 (n = 653) |
ITN = insecticide-treated net; RCH = reproductive and child health.
Response assessed by supervisor during Malaria Service and Data Quality Improvement supervision.
Subset of clients attending first antenatal care visit.