Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 6;110(3 Suppl):76–82. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0528

Table 3.

Regression analysis of facility readiness and competency in the management of severe malaria comparing pre-Champions OTSS scores to post-Champions OTSS scores*

Variables Pre-Champions Post-Champions round 1
% change (95% CI)
Post-Champions round 2
% change (95% CI)
Post-Champions round 3
% change (95% CI)
Overall management of severe malaria (score) Ref 3.3 (–7.0 to 13.6)
P = 0.519
11.3 (0.4–22.1)
P = 0.042
14.3 (3.2–25.4)
P = 0.013
Patient assessment (score) Ref 8.7 (–4.9 to 22.4)
P = 0.204
16.2 (1.8–30.6)
P = 0.029
21.0 (6.2–35.8)
P = 0.006
Providing the right treatment (score) Ref 8.8 (–0.6 to 18.2)
P = 0.065
9.7 (–0.2 to 19.6)
P = 0.056
8.0 (–2.1 to 18.1)
P = 0.119
Health facility readiness score (score) Ref 6.9 (2.5–11.3)
P = 0.003
5.9 (1.5–10.3)
P = 0.010
6.5 (2.0–11.0)
P = 0.006
Material availability (score) Ref 13.9 (7.6–20.2)
P = 0.000
15.9 (9.6–22.2)
P = 0.000
14.8 (8.3–21.3)
P = 0.000
Documentation availability (score) Ref 3.0 (–8.5 to 14.4)
P = 0.604
7.5 (–4.0 to 19.0)
P = 0.193
10.8 (–1.0 to 22.5)
P = 0.071

CI = confidence interval; OTSS = Outreach Training and Supportive Supervision; Ref = reference variable: round 3.

*

Regression analysis was not possible for ACT availability by age group as ACTs were available at almost all facilities across all rounds. Regression analysis also was not possible for complications (hypoglycemia, anemia, alteration of consciousness) due to small sample sizes.