Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 6;47(3):310–324. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03657-x

Table 3.

Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hepatic PFS (hPFS)

Category Median (95% CI) p-value HR (95% CI) p-value HR
Overall survival
Position of TARE in the continuum of care 1st line TARE 16.2 (9.0–27.2) 0.0028
1st line TARE plus CT 32.5 (11.8–27.0) 0.64 (0.34–1.22) 0.1730
2nd line TARE 12.0 (8.2–20.8) 1.28 (0.82–2.02) 0.2817
 > 2nd line TARE 9.3 (4.5–14.7) 2.37 (1.31–4.29) 0.0042
Extrahepatic disease prior to TARE No 18.4 (11.8–22.9) 0.0023 0.55 (0.37–0.81) 0.0026
Yes 10.9 (6.2–14.7)
Cirrhosis No 16.6 (13.2–21.1) 0.0051 0.47 (0.28–0.81) 0.0062
Yes 7.7. (3.8–10.0)
Dose methodology BSA/mBSA 12.0 (9.4–16.6) 0.0363 0.67 (0.46–0.98) 0.0379
Partition model 17.1 (10.1–26.2)
Locoregional treatments after TARE No 11.8 (9.7–16.6) 0.0101 1.98 (1.17–3.37) 0.0116
Yes 27.7 (16.2–37.0)
Systemic therapy after TARE No 9.3 (7.0–14.0) 0.0008 1.87 (1.29–2.71) 0.0010
Yes 20.6 (14.7–26.2)
Additional treatments after TARE No 8.2 (5.7–11.2) 0.0000 2.36 (1.62–3.43) 0.0000
Yes 20.8 (15.4–27.7)
Progression-free survival
Position of TARE in the continuum of care 1st line TARE 7.4 (3.9–11.0) 0.0012
1st line TARE plus CT 11.3 (6.1–14.0) 0.80 (0.46–1.40) 0.4405
2nd line TARE 5.1 (3.1–6.4) 1.56 (1.04–2.33) 0.0300
 > 2nd line TARE 3.5 (2.5–4.3) 2.36 (1.39–4.04) 0.0016
Extrahepatic disease prior to TARE No 6.9 (5.2–8.6) 0.0025 0.59 (0.42–0.83) 0.0028
Yes 3.6 (3.0–6.0)
Time from diagnosis to treatment  < 6.1 7.5 (5.3–10.2) 0.0054 1.59 (1.15–2.22) 0.0057
 >  = 6.1 4.4 (3.8–6.2)
Total tumour to liver (%)  < 10% 7.3 (4.4–12.0) 0.0602
10–20% 7.1 (4.4–9.3) 1.44 (0.89–2.34) 0.1414
 > 20% 4.4 (3.5–7.0) 1.74 (1.09–2.80) 0.0210
Hepatic progression-free survival
Position of TARE in the continuum of care 1st line TARE 7.5 (4.3–11.0) 0.0005
1st line TARE plus CT 13.8 (8.3–28.1) 0.63 (0.35–1.12) 0.1140
2nd line TARE 5.7 (3.8–7.2) 1.54 (1.03–2.30) 0.0337
 > 2nd line TARE 3.9 (2.6–5.7) 2.15 (1.27–3.67) 0.0047
Extrahepatic disease prior to TARE No 7.4 (5.7–9.3) 0.0032 0.60 (0.42–0.84) 0.0035
Yes 5.0 (3.1–6.4)
Time from diagnosis to treatment  < 6.1 8.6 (6.1–10.7) 0.0021 1.68 (1.20–2.35) 0.0023
 >  = 6.1 5.7 (4.0–7.1)

Cox model, p-value 0.05. Only variables with a p < 0.05 are shown here. A complete overview of the outcomes of the univariable analyses for OS, PFS and hPFS can be found in supplements 4–6

Levels of significance: p < 0.05 (Log-rank test [Mantel–Haenszel version]). The following variables were considered: Gender; ECOG; Extrahepatic disease prior to treatment; Location of liver tumors; Ascites; Cirrhosis; Prior surgery; Dose methodology; Treatment intention; Prior locoregional treatments; Locoregional treatments after TARE; Systemic therapy after TARE; Additional treatments after TARE; Time from diagnosis to treatment (months); Total tumour to liver (%); Right tumour to liver (%); Left tumour to liver (%); ALBI grade and International Normalized Ratio

ALBI albumin-bilirubin, BSA body surface area, CI confidence interval, CT concomitant treatment, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, ICC intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, HR hazard ratio, TARE transarterial radioembolization