Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;11(2):475–485. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00648-3

Table 2.

Simple linear regression analysis for the imaging parameters

Thermala versus ultrasound imaging parameters β coefficient (95% CI) P value
Right elbow
 MIN versus Total GS score 0.15 (0.01, 0.28) 0.033*
 MAX versus Total GS score 0.16 (0.02, 0.30) 0.030*
 AVG versus Total GS score 0.15 (0.03, 0.28) 0.020*
 MIN versus Total PD score 0.09 (0.01, 0.16) 0.029*
 MAX versus Total PD score 0.11 (0.03, 0.18) 0.009**
 AVG versus Total PD score 0.09 (0.02, 0.16) 0.018*
Left elbow
 MIN versus Total GS score 0.04 (− 0.07, 0.16) 0.430
 MAX versus Total GS score 0.11 (− 0.02, 0.23) 0.086
 AVG versus Total GS score 0.08 (− 0.04, 0.19) 0.172
 MIN versus Total PD score 0.06 (0.01, 0.10) 0.012*
 MAX versus Total PD score 0.08 (0.03, 0.13) 0.002**
 AVG versus Total PD score 0.07 (0.03, 0.11) 0.003**

CI confidence interval, GS greyscale, PD power Doppler

aMAX, AVG and MIN are thermographic parameters derived from summing the respective Tmax, Tavg and Tmin at each elbow (medial, lateral, posterior and anterior aspects)

Statistically significant: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01