Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 27;55(1):737–748. doi: 10.1007/s42770-023-01182-0

Table 2.

Field experiment adjusted averages of maize productivity and P concentration (g kg−1) and total P accumulated in the grains (kg ha−1) inoculated with two strains of B. pumilus (B32) and B. subtilis (B70)

Treatment* Maize plant Maize grain
Dry biomass (kg ha−1) P (g kg−1) P accumulated (kg ha−1) Productivity (kg ha−1) Y1a (%) Y2 (%) Y3 (%) Y4 (%)
zero P control 6027c 2.42a* 12.53b* 5165.7b** 85 100 86 94
TS control 10322a 2.23a 13.41b 6053.8b 100 117 101 110
RP control 7116c 2.23a 13.39b 5996.4b 99 116 100 109
B32 + RP 6164c 2.19a 11.45b 5212.9b 86 100 87 94
B70 + RP 7680b 2.47a 15.95a 6532.0a 108 126 109 118
RPTS control 5756c 2.17a 11.98b 5517.9b 91 106 92 100
B32 + RPTS 6285c 2.36a 15.19a 6468.9a 107 125 108 117
B70 + RPTS 6581c 2.33a 16.50a 7085.9a 117 137 118 128

aY1 = relative grain yield to TS control; Y2 = relative grain yield to zero P control; Y3 = relative grain yield to RP control; Y4 = relative grain yield to RPTS control. RP rock phosphate, TS triple superphosphate; RPTS RP + TS

*Means in each column followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Scott-Knott’s test (p ≤ 0.05), except productivity (**p ≤ 0.1)