Skip to main content
. 2024 Winter;15(1):109–114. doi: 10.22088/cjim.15.1.12

Table 1.

Comparison of the MINOCA and the MI-CAD patients

Variable MINOCA
(N=29)
MI-CAD
(N=625)
P-value
Age (y), Mean±SD 47.14 ± 6.2 57.61 ± 9.1 <0.001 a
BMI (kg/m2), Mean±SD 25.3 ± 3.5 26.5 ± 4.04 0.04 a
Sex (male), N (%) 22 (76.7) 423 (67.7) 0.08 b
DM, N (%) 5 (17) 202 (32.3) 0.09 b
HTN, N (%) 8 (28) 318 (50.8) 0.005 b
Smoking, N (%) 10 (34) 231 (36.9) 0.45 b
HLP, N (%) 10 (34) 211 (33.8) 0.5 b
LVEF (%), Mean±SD 47.4 ± 9.47 43.5 ± 6.8 0.02 a
Site of myocardial infarction, N (%) <0.001 b
Anterior 6 (20.7) 361 (57.8)
Non-anterior 23 (79.3) 264 (42.2)
One-year mortality, N (%) 0 55 (8.8) 0.07 b

MINOCA myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary artery, MI-CAD myocardial infarction with obstructive coronary artery. DM diabetes mellitus, HTN hypertension, HLP hyperlipidemia, BMI body mass index, LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction. Data are expressed as mean ± SD, or number (percent). a; independent t test, b : chi-square test.