Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):e081951. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081951

Table 1.

Questionnaire for the assessment of the feasibility of QIs for PAAM from a provider point of view

For each QI
Relevance
 Do you consider this QI suitable to meaningfully describe/measure the quality of care in this specific aspect of prehospital advanced airway management? Yes/no/I don’t know
Acceptance
 Would you accept that an aspect of the quality of prehospital advanced airway management would be measured and rated using this indicator? Yes/no/I don’t know
Reliability of data collection
 How do you estimate the reliability of data collection for this QI? Excellent/good/fair/poor/very poor
Promoting and hindering factors
 Are there additional promoting factors for retrieving data required for this QI? And if so, what promoting factors? Free text
 Are there additional hindering factors for retrieving data required for this QI? And if so, what hindering factors? Free text
Only for QI 1, 2, 3, 15, 17
Effort
 How much time would you approximately need to obtain the required data to calculate this QI? Time (minutes)
 Under your given day-to-day practice routine, is this effort reasonable to you? Yes/no/I don’t know
General questions about the REDCap CRF
Effort
 How much time would you approximately need to complete a REDCap CRF airway management for a simple procedure (success at first attempt) Time (minutes)
 Under your given day-to-day practice routine, is this effort reasonable to you? Yes/no/I don’t know

CRF, case report form; PAAM, prehospital advanced airway management; QI, quality indicator.