Table 2.
Estimates from random intercept ordinal regressions with the introduction of new technologies and the evaluation of implementation as predictors and pain complaints after eight months as outcomes
| Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | ||
| Introduction of new technologies | None | Ref | Ref |
| Not sure | 0.87 [0.51, 1.50] | 0.82 [0.47, 1.43] | |
| Yes | 0.91 [0.65, 1.28] | 0.83 [0.58, 1.19] | |
| Quality of training | Very poor | Ref | Ref |
| Rather poor | 0.35 [0.17, 0.70] | 0.37 [0.18, 0.75] | |
| Neither poor nor good | 0.39 [0.21, 0.73] | 0.44 [0.23, 0.84] | |
| Not sure | 0.42 [0.21, 0.86] | 0.51 [0.24, 1.08] | |
| Rather good | 0.34 [0.18, 0.61] | 0.39 [0.21, 0.73] | |
| Very good | 0.29 [0.15, 0.58] | 0.33 [0.16, 0.67] |
Note: OR: Odds ratio, 95% CI: 95% confidence interval
Model 1 was adjusted for the level of outcome at baseline, gender, age, level of education
Model 2 was adjusted for the level of outcome at baseline, gender, age, level of education, and psychosocial work factors (quantitative job demands and control over decisions)
Statistically significant estimates given in bold