Table 4.

Influence of research training on the type of value (attainment, intrinsic and utility) attributed to research by different demographic groups (career stage, gender, and professional groups)

	Attainment		P value	Intrinsic		P value	Utility		P Value
Characteristic	No research training	Had research training		No research training	Had research training		No research training	Had research training
Career stage
Early	49.60 ± 0.75	53.26 ± 0.75	< 0.001	48.98 ± 0.85	51.51 ± 0.85	0.038	40.81 ± 0.53	41.51 ± 0.53	0.356
Mid	49.68 ± 0.84	51.57 ± 0.70	0.088	50.16 ± 0.96	52.21 ± 0.79	0.101	42.18 ± 0.59	39.64 ± 0.49	0.001
Late	46.48 ± 1.05	52.06 ± 0.86	< 0.001	47.29 ± 1.19	53.28 ± 0.98	< 0.001	39.25 ± 0.74	41.65 ± 0.61	0.014
Gender
Male	49.84 ± 1.37	53.83 ± 0.85	0.029	52.21 ± 1.53	53.51 ± 0.95	0.142	39.05 ± 0.97	40.16 ± 0.60	0.332
Female	48.57 ± 0.54	51.63 ± 0.52	0.390	48.32 ± 0.60	51.86 ± 0.58	0.019	41.21 ± 0.38	41.11 ± 0.37	0.856
Professional group
AH	48.59 ± 1.16	51.62 ± 0.74	0.029	49.81 ± 1.29	52.78 ± 0.82	0.054	41.81 ± 0.80	41.09 ± 0.51	0.448
M	49.04 ± 1.25	52.17 ± 0.89	0.043	49.13 ± 1.40	50.37 ± 1.00	0.469	38.30 ± 0.86	39.46 ± 0.62	0.277
N&M	48.71 ± 0.63	52.89 ± 0.73	< 0.001	48.48 ± 0.70	53.14 ± 0.82	< 0.001	41.31 ± 0.43	41.55 ± 0.50	0.728

Data are presented as mean ± SE. P values are reported for group analysis from post hoc analysis. Student's t- test was conducted for previous research training. For career stage and professional groups, two-way ANOVA was conducted followed by post-hoc test with Bonferroni correction values as shown

AH  allied health, M  medical, N&M  nursing and midwifery