Table 2.
Overall characteristics of the 26 included reports
Characteristics | Number of reports | References | |
---|---|---|---|
Data source | |||
Self-reports | 19 | [1, 2, 21, 24, 34, 36–48, 51] | |
Registers | 7 | [4–6, 30, 49, 50, 52] | |
Gender stratification | |||
Only men | 2 | [36, 37] | |
Only women | 1 | [44] | |
Gender stratification | 20 | [1, 2, 4–6, 30, 34, 38–43, 45–50, 52] | |
No gender stratification | 3 | [21, 24, 51] | |
WLE (definition) | |||
Economic activity expectancy (employed or unemployed) | 8 | [1, 2, 36, 37, 41, 43, 44, 52] | |
Employment expectancy | 13 | [4–6, 21, 30, 34, 38, 40, 45–48, 51] | |
Productive work expectancy | 2 | [49, 50] | |
HWLE (definition) | 5 | ||
Years being healthy and employed | 3 | [21, 39, 51] | |
Years employed without disability | 1 | [24] | |
Years being economically active without functional limitations | 1 | [1] | |
Working years lost | 13 | ||
Retirement | 6 | [5, 6, 34, 36, 37, 46] | |
Disability | 6 | [5, 6, 36, 37, 47, 50] | |
Unemployment | 6 | [4–6, 42, 46, 50] | |
Economically inactive/outside of the labour market | 10 | [4–6, 34, 42, 44, 46, 47, 50] | |
Involuntary exit (unemployment, disability) | 1 | [30] | |
Voluntary exit (retirement, inactive) | 1 | [30] | |
Socioeconomic indicator | |||
Level of education | 21 | [1, 2, 6, 21, 24, 30, 34, 36–44, 46–49, 52] | |
Social or occupational class | 7 | [4, 5, 21, 45, 48–50] | |
Approach for calculation of WLE | |||
Prevalence-based | 5 | [1, 2, 5, 46, 48] | |
Incidence-based | 21 | [4, 6, 21, 24, 30, 34, 36–45, 47, 49–52] | |
Type of life Tablea | |||
Period | 21 | [1, 2, 4–6, 21, 30, 34, 38–47, 49–52] | |
Cohort | 6 | [5, 24, 36, 37, 48, 50] | |
Interval-censoringb | |||
No interval censoring | 1 | [50] | |
Less than one year | 4 | [6, 30, 42, 49] | |
One year or more | 16 | [4, 21, 24, 34, 36–41, 43–45, 47, 49–52] | |
Censoring by age | |||
Around retirement age | 10 | [1, 2, 6, 24, 30, 42, 48–50, 52] | |
No age censoring | 16 | [4, 5, 21, 34, 36–41, 43–47, 51] |
aIn study by Leinonen and co-authors (2018) both types of life table were used
bOnly for studies that used incidence-based approach for estimation of WLE or related indicators