Table 3:
Estimate (95% CI) | p value | Cohen’s d (95% CI) | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Linear mixed model for repeated measures (ITT population) * | |||
Control vs stand-alone iCBT | 6·32 (3·37–9·27) | <0·0001 | 0·97 (0·64–1·30) |
Control vs guided iCBT | 5·80 (2·71–8·88) | <0·0001 | 0·96 (0·62–1·30) |
ANCOVA with last observation carried forward (ITT population) † | |||
Control vs stand-alone iCBT | 5·81 (3·38–8·24) | <0·0001 | 0·90 (0·59–1·20) |
Control vs guided iCBT | 5·58 (3·02–8·13) | <0·0001 | 0·89 (0·57–1·21) |
ANCOVA with multiple imputations (ITT population) † | |||
Control vs stand-alone iCBT | 6·32 (4·20–8·45) | <0·0001 | 0·99 (0·67–1·31) |
Control vs guided iCBT | 5·71 (3·48–7·94) | <0·0001 | 0·94 (0·60–1·27) |
ANCOVA with complete cases † | |||
Control vs stand-alone iCBT | 6·36 (3·85–8·86) | <0·0001 | 0·99 (0·66–1·33) |
Control vs guided iCBT | 5·93 (3·33–8·54) | <0·0001 | 0·97 (0·63–1·32) |
Linear mixed model for repeated measures (mITT population) † | |||
Control vs stand-alone iCBT | 6·41 (3·37–9·46) | <0·0001 | 0·95 (0·61–1·30) |
Control vs guided iCBT | 5·97 (2·88–9·07) | <0·0001 | 0·94 (0·60–1·29) |
Data are the difference in BDI-II score (points) between the two groups specified at week 12. BDI-II=Beck Depression Inventory-II. iCBT=internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy. ITT=intention to treat. mITT=modified intention to treat.
Prespecified primary analysis.
Prespecified sensitivity analysis.