Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Front Neuroendocrinol. 2023 Oct 4;71:101103. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2023.101103

Table 5.

Referenced brain imaging studies investigating PAE and including both sexes, ranked and sorted by rigor in addressing sex as a biological variable.

Rigor
Score1
Reference Species (Age) Includes
Both
Sexes
Main Effect
of sex
PAE by Sex
Interaction
Statistics
Performed
Strengths Limitations
5 (Chen et al., 2012) Humans (Late Adolescent/Young Adult) Yes Yes Yes Multivariate ANOVA A control group (no PAE) was included in statistical analyses to determine differences from two distinct alcohol-exposed group Females disproportionally represented (73%) in one PAE group
5 (Nardelli et al., 2011) Humans (Child and Adolescent) Yes Yes Yes Univariate and Multivariate ANOVA Sexes assessed independently, appropriate controls included
4 (Uban et al., 2017) Humans (Child and Adolescent) Yes Reported for hormone levels, but not overall imaging metrics Yes ANOVA & linear regression models Sexes assessed independently, appropriate controls included
1 (Archibald et al., 2001) Humans (Adolescent) Yes Not assessed Not assessed Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests A control group (no PAE) was included in statistical analyses to determine differences from two alcohol-exposed groups: PAE and FAS Sex was not included in statistical analyses, likely due to modest sample sizes among groups
1 (Astley et al., 2009) Humans (Child to Adolescent) Yes Not assessed Not assessed ANOVA A control group (no PAE) was included in statistical analyses to determine differences from three distinct alcohol-exposed groups Sex was not included in statistical analyses, likely due to modest sample sizes among groups
1 (Cortese et al., 2006) Humans (Preadolescent2 and adolescent) Yes Not assessed Not assessed Independent t-tests A control group (no PAE) was included in statistical analyses to determine differences from alcohol-exposed subjects with or without a diagnosis of FAS Sex was not included in statistical analyses, likely due to modest sample sizes among groups.
1 (Lees et al., 2020) Humans (Preadolescent2) Yes Unknown Implied, but unknown Sex included as a coviariate in mixed model and mediation analyses Sex differences excluded from statistical analyses
1 (Li et al., 2008) Humans (Late Adolescent/Young Adult) Yes Not assessed Not assessed Group t-tests A control group (no PAE) was included in statistical analyses to determine differences from alcohol-exposed subjects Sex was not included in statistical analyses, likely due to modest sample sizes among groups
1 (Sowell et al., 2001) Humans (Child and Adolescent) Yes Not assessed Not assessed T-tests A control group (no PAE) was included in statistical analyses to determine differences from alcohol-exposed subjects Sex was not included in statistical analyses, likely due to modest sample sizes among groups
1

Studies were ranked on a scale of 1 to 5 based on strength of sex differences assessed. Points were assigned based on:

1)

Were both sexes included? (Yes: 1pt; No/Unknown: 0 pts)

2)

Were sexes directly compared to each other (statistical main effect of sex)? (Yes: 2 pts; No/Unknown: 0 pts)

2a)

If not, were sexes assessed independently? (Yes: 1pt; No/Unknown: 0 pts)

3)

Was a PAE by sex Interaction statistically assessed? (Yes: 2 pts; No/Unknown: 0 pts)

3a)

If not, were PAE effects reported for each sex independently? (Yes: 1pt; No/Unknown: 0 pts)

2

Preadolescent as the late childhood epoch directly preceding adolescence, including ages 9–11