Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ear Hear. 2023 Sep 28;45(2):505–510. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001434

Table 2.

Comparisons of behavioral audiometric testing success for the entire study population (top section) as well as broken down by test type: visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA) versus conditioned play audiometry (CPA) (bottom two sections). Testing success is broken down by transducer type (air or bone) and number of thresholds obtained. Only ears on which a test was attempted are included in these calculations. n indicates number of ears. Note that one child (2 ears) tested in the clinic and 1 child (2 ears) tested in the lab (control group) were tested via conventional audiometric techniques and is therefore represented in the top section but not in either bottom section as VRA and CPA were not used. Bone conduction outcomes are not presented for control ears as they were rarely, if ever, tested, due to thresholds within-normal-limits.

Ear-Specific Audiometry: All Methods
Visit n Age (months) Attempted, 0 Thresholds ≥ 1 Air Threshold ≥ 4 Air Thresholds ≥ 1 Unmasked Bone Threshold ≥ 1 Masked Bone Threshold
Clinic 70 23 74% 26% 17% 13% 3%
Research 76 23 53% 47% 36% 4% 21%
Control 27 24 70% 30% 30%
Audiometry: VRA
Visit n Age (months) Attempted, 0 Thresholds ≥ 1 Air Threshold ≥ 4 Air Thresholds ≥ 1 Unmasked Bone Threshold ≥ 1 Masked Bone Threshold
Clinic 48 15 100% 0% 0% 4% 0%
Research 56 15 70% 30% 14% 4% 13%
Control 15 14 100% 0% 0%
Audiometry: CPA
Visit n Age (months) Attempted, 0 Thresholds ≥ 1 Air Threshold ≥ 4 Air Thresholds ≥ 1 Unmasked Bone Threshold ≥ 1 Masked Bone Threshold
Clinic 20 39 20% 80% 50% 10% 35%
Research 20 41 5% 95% 95% 5% 45%
Control 10 41 20% 80% 80%