Table 4.

Patient Factors Associated with Screening Completion (N=529)

Variable	Bivariable Model	Multivariable Modela
Age	1.05 (1.01, 1.08); p=.0064	1.05 (1.02, 1.09); p=.0050
Gender
Female (n=235)	1.17 (0.78, 1.74); p=.4461
Male (n=294)	Reference
Race
White (n=463)	1.40 (0.79, 2.46); p=.2495
Non-White (n=66)	Reference
Education
Less than high school (n=20)	1.31 (0.42, 4.13); p=.6407
High school graduate or equivalent (n=94)	1.01 (0.57, 1.80); p=.9625
Some college (n=233)	0.99 (0.63, 1.55); p=.9687
College graduate or higher (n=182)	Reference
Perceived Financial Adequacy
Have enough for special things (=288)	0.84 (0.56, 1.25); p=.3919
Barely or Not Enough (n=241)	Reference
Family History of Lung Cancer
Yes (n=143)	1.48 (0.92, 2.36); p=.1057	1.39 (0.84, 2.31); p=.2044
No (n=386)	Reference	Reference
Smoking Status
Currently smokes (n=233)	1.01 (0.68, 1.51); p=.9580
Used to smoke (n=296)	Reference
Knowledge: Lung Cancer Risk & Screening	1.04 (1.00, 1.09); p=.0323	1.24 (1.07, 1.44); p=.0045
Lung Cancer Screening Health Beliefs
Perceived Risk of Lung Cancer	0.94 (0.84, 1.05); p=.2787
Perceived Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening	0.94 (0.88, 1.01); p=.0741	1.00 (0.93, 1.08); p=.9850
Perceived Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening	1.03 (1.00, 1.05); p=.0338	0.99 (0.96, 1.02); p=.4650
Self-Efficacy for Lung Cancer Screening	1.11 (1.06, 1.16); p<.0001	1.12 (1.05, 1.19); p=.0003
Psychological Characteristics
Stigma	0.99 (0.92, 1.07);p=.8262
Mistrust (Trust)	0.97 (0.90, 1.04); p=.4250
Perception that Lung Cancer Screening Decision was Shared	1.01 (1.00, 1.01)); p=.0348	1.00 (1.00, 1.01); p=.5333

^aMultivariable model includes independent variables that had p<.20 from bivariate models.

Values are OR (95% CI) from logistic regression models of screening completion (n=399, 75.4%) versus non-completion (n=130, 24.6%).

The odds ratio (OR) for continuous predictors is per a 1-point increase.