Table 5.

Factors Associated with Decision to Screen for Lung Cancer (N=529)

Variable	Bivariable Model	Multivariable Modela
Age	1.13 (1.05, 1.22); p=.0009	1.12 (1.04, 1.22);p=.0050
Gender
Female (n=235)	0.73 (0.33, 1.62); p=.4364
Male (n=294)	Reference
Race
White (n=463)	1.36 (0.45, 4.09); p=.5863
Non-White (n=66)	Reference
Education
Less than high school (n=20)	>99 (<0.1, >999); p=.9998
High school graduate or equivalent (n=94)	0.59 (0.19,1.80); p=.3507
Some college (n=233)	0.74 (0.28, 1.91); p=.5297
College graduate or higher (n=182)	reference
Perceived Financial Adequacy
Enough for special things (n=288)	0.79 (0.35, 1.79); p=.5684
Barely or Not Enough (n=241)	Reference
Family History of Lung Cancer
Yes (n=143)	0.64 (0.28, 1.49); p=.3044
No (n=386)	Reference
Smoking Status
Currently Smokes (n=233)	1.00 (0.45, 2.25); p=.9963
Used to Smoke (n=296)	reference
Knowledge: Lung Cancer Risk & Screening	0.97 (0.63, 1.51); p=.9092
Lung Cancer Screening Health Beliefs
Perceived Risk of Lung Cancer	0.82 (0.64, 1.05); p=.1099	0.93 (0.69, 1.25); p=.6146
Perceived Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening	0.80 (0.71, 0.92); p=.0011	0.87 (0.74, 1.02); p=.0787
Perceived Barriers to Lung Cancer Screening	1.07 (1.02, 1.12); p=.0068	1.02 (0.95, 1.09); p=.5594
Self-Efficacy for Lung Cancer Screening	1.14 (1.06, 1.23); p=.0008	1.11 (1.00, 1.23); p=.0407
Psychological Characteristics
Stigma	0.89 (0.76, 1.04); p=.1464	0.91 (0.76, 1.08); p=.2677
Mistrust (Trust)	0.93 (0.81, 1.07); p=.2953
Perception that Lung Cancer Screening Decision was Shared	1.00 (0.99, 1.01); p=.8695

^aMultivariable model includes independent variables that had p<.20 from bivariate models.

Values are OR (95% CI) from logistic regression models of decision to opt-in (n=504, 95.3%) versus deciding to not opt-in (n=25, 4.7%).

The odds ratio (OR) for continuous predictors is per a 1-point increase.