Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024 Jan 4;120:105991. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.105991

Table 2.

One-way comparisons for the five motor speech components (top) and correlations between motor speech components with dystonia and parkinsonism scales (bottom). DF = degrees of freedom.

Components Control
M (SD)
XDP
M (SD)
DF Mean Square F value p-value Adjusted p-value Cohen’s d
Coordination −.35 (.11) −.19 (.08) 1 .31 33.36 <001** <001** 1.60
Consistency −13.28 (6.67) −17.46 (6.70) 1 5.06 5.06 .03* .03* .62
Speed .40 (6.67) −.05 (1.54) 1 11.46 11.46 <001** <001** .94
Precision 7.70 (4.03) 4.58 (2.59) 1 11.06 11.06 .002* .002* .92
Rate 7.10 (1.09) 5.95 (1.15) 1 17.02 13.49 <001** <001** 1.02
Components MDS-UPDRS1 MDS-UPDRS 2 MDS-UPDRS 3 MDS-UPDRS 4 BFM Movement BFM Disability TWSTRS Disability TWSTRS Pain
Coordination .16 .38* .38* .43* .20 49* .21 .25
Consistency −.29* −.24 −.31 −.23 −.33* −.31* −.18 −.25
Speed −.29* −.35* −.38* −.31* −.36* −.33* −.27 −.22
Precision −.25 −.33* −.40* −.30* −.30 −.31* −.21 −.20
Rate −.30* −.39* −.24 −.37* −.36* −.40* −.34* −.31*
* =

statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05;

** =

statistically significant at p ≤ 0.001.