Table 4.
MI-SIGHT program satisfaction with glasses service
| Overall (n=1166) | Visual Impairment due to Un/Undercorrected Refractive Error (n=96) | Un/Undercorrected Refractive Error Without Visual Impairment (n=168) | No or Adequately Corrected Refractive Error (n=878) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Categorical Variable | #/total (Column %) | #/total (Column %) | #/total (Column %) | p-value* | |
| Ordered Glasses | 830/1166 (71.2) | 78/96 (81.3) | 138/168 (82.1) | 600/878 (68.3) | 0.0001a,b |
| Satisfaction w/ Glasses | |||||
| Satisfied | 803/822 (97.7) | 75/76 (98.7) | 135/138 (97.8) | 579/594 (97.5) | |
| Dissatisfied | 11/822 (1.3) | 1/76 (1.3) | 1/138 (0.7) | 9/594 (1.5) | 0.9001 |
| Dissatisfied - remake required | 8/822 (1.0) | 0/76 (0.0) | 2/138 (1.5) | 6/594 (1.0) | |
| Continuous Variable | Mean (SD), Median | Mean (SD), Median | Mean (SD), Median | Mean (SD), Median | p-value** |
| Cost of Glasses | 36.8 (25.2), 32.6 | 34.3 (19.5), 31.7 | 36.9 (22.8), 32.9 | 37.3 (26.6), 33.0 | 0.8843 |
MI-SIGHT, Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine; SD, Standard Deviation
*
Chi-square (categorical variables with cell frequency ≥5) or Fisher exact test with Monte-Carlo simulation (categorical variables with cell counts <5)
**
ANOVA (continuous variables)
Post-hoc pairwise chi-square or Fisher exact comparisons with Holm-adjustment showed significant differences between:
a
Visual Impairment due to un/under-corrected refractive error versus No/Minor refractive error,
b
Un/Undercorrected refractive error versus No/Minor refractive error