Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 8.
Published in final edited form as: Econ Dev Cult Change. 2019 Jul;67(4):725–755. doi: 10.1086/698852

TABLE 6.

CONTROLS FOR HEALTH BELIEFS PREDICT SANITATION BUT DO NOT CHANGE MAIN RESULT

Dependent Variable: Household Open Defecation
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Village untouchability Ai .0743*** .0739*** .0732**
(.0267) (.0285) (.0285)
Household untouchability A −.00276 −.000502 .000161
(.00961) (.0107) (.0107)
Village untouchability Bi .0586** .0569** .0565**
(.0264) (.0282) (.0282)
Household untouchability B .00513 .0119 .0126
(.00942) (.0106) (.0106)
Health beliefs F5 = 5.61 F5 = 5.57 F−5 = 5.61 F5 = 5.60
p < .0001 p < .0001 p < .0001 p < .0001
Doctor social contact −.0250* −.0259*
(.0140) (.0141)
Other health social contact .00869 .00861
(.0143) (.0143)
All controls from table 2
n (rural households) 27,320 22,016 22,016 27,320 22,017 22,017

Note. The dependent variable is an indicator for household open defecation. “Village untouchabilityi” is the fraction of households other than the respondent’s that report practicing untouchability in the respondent’s village. “Open defecation” is an indicator at the household level. “Health beliefs” is the set of dependent variables from table 4. “Doctor social contact” and “other health social contact” are indicators for the household reporting knowing somebody in their family, caste, or community, as in table 5. Each regression includes the most complete set of controls from the main results in table 2: consumption as a cubic polynomial, caste by religion indicators, state fixed effects, and the set of extended controls. The regressions in cols. 1 and 4 are identical to those in panels A and B of table 2, col. 6. Standard errors, clustered by village, are in parentheses.

*

p < .10.

**

p < .05.

***

p < .01.