Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;15(1):39–51. doi: 10.1007/s13167-024-00350-y

Table 2.

The classification results of different baseline methods (%). The values outside and inside the brackets represent the mean value and variance, respectively

Method Accuracy
(95% CI)
Precision
(95% CI)
Recall
(95% CI)
F1-score
(95% CI)
Kappa
(95% CI)
AUC
(95% CI)
Res-18

93.19

(92.41–93.97)

90.62

(84.54–96.70)

87.08

(82.99–91.16)

88.90

(86.71–91.09)

86.93

(84.63–89.23)

99.12

(99.12–99.12)

Res-34

93.01

(92.43–93.59)

91.60

(89.77–93.43)

86.19

(81.50–90.88)

88.76

(86.98–90.54)

87.20

(86.34–88.06)

98.98

(98.98–98.98)

Res-50

92.69

(92.02–93.36)

90.73

(89.76–91.70)

87.68

(86.74–88.62)

89.21

(88.57–89.85)

87.01

(86.37–87.65)

98.27

(98.26–98.28)

ViT-small

92.37

(92.31–92.43)

90.19

(90.05–90.33)

89.97

(89.72–90.22)

90.02

(89.94–90.10)

88.56

(88.39–88.73)

98.82

(98.82–98.82)

RegionViT

90.25

(90.17–90.33)

87.69

(87.50–87.88)

83.38

(82.99–83.77)

85.48

(85.29–85.67)

83.51

(83.32–83.70)

98.04

(97.98–98.09)

MaxViT

94.62

(94.34–94.90)

94.07

(93.32–94.82)

90.56

(88.64–92.48)

92.34

(91.87–92.81)

91.15

(90.37–91.93)

99.08

(99.07–99.09)