Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 8;14:38. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01264-8

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

VA-ECMO sweep gas flow according the diaphragm thickness evolution at the end of follow-up. See Day 2 sweep gas flow was significantly different between groups (Kruskal–Wallis test, p-value = 0.01464, Fig. 3) and also when comparing the atrophy group to the stable group using Dunn’s test and Bonferroni correction (5 l/min [4, 5] to 3 l/min [2,4], p-value = 0.0066)