Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 8;14:38. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01264-8

Table 2.

Patients outcomes in patients with or without diaphragm atrophy

Variable Patient outcomes according to three groups of diaphragm thickness evolution (: stable, atrophy, increase) using a ultrasound method Patient outcomes according to the absence or the presence of diaphragm atrophy using a ultrasound method
Increase, N = 41 Decrease, N = 71 Stable, N = 181 p-value2 Non-atrophy, N = 221 Atrophy, N = 71 p-value3
Deceased before VA-ECMO weaning 1 (25%) 3 (43%) 4 (22%) 0.7 5 (23%) 3 (43%) 0.4
VA-ECMO weaning failure 1 (25%) 4 (57%) 7 (39%) 0.6 8 (36%) 4 (57%) 0.4
VA-ECMO days 5 [3.8, 7] 4 [2, 6] 6.5 [4, 11] 0.2 6 [4, 10] 4 [2, 6] 0.10
Days with mechanical ventilation 4 [2, 5] 8 [7, 20] 5 [1, 11] 0.059 5 [1, 10] 8 [7, 20] 0.029
Ventilator free days at day 60 55 [40, 58] 7 [0, 29] 54 [20, 59] 0.056 54 [20, 59] 7 [0, 29] 0.018
Deceased at day 60 1 (25%) 5 (71%) 4 (22%) 0.063 5 (23%) 5 (71%) 0.030
Deceased at day 7 1 (25%) 3 (43%) 1 (5.6%) 0.059 2 (9.1%) 3 (43%) 0.075

Results are reported for patients according to their diaphragm evolution status at the end of patient follow up. The population was divided in three categories whether the diaphragm thickness presented a 10% decrease, increase or remained stable from baseline to the last assessment. Outcomes are presented after 60 days of follow-up (unless otherwise specified)

1n (%); Median [interquartile range]

2Fisher’s exact test; Kruskal–Wallis rank sum test

3Fisher’s exact test; Wilcoxon rank sum test