Table 2.
Intragroup and intergroup neurologic scoring results
| Groups | Pre-op | Post-op1 | Post-op7 | Post-op14 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | (Mean ± SD) | |
| Control | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z |
| Sham | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z |
| I/R | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 2,00 ± 0,50 a, x | 2,11 ± 0,33 a, x | 2,55 ± 0,52 a, x |
| I/R + Vehicle | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 2,33 ± 0,50 a, x | 2,22 ± 0,44 a, x | 2,44 ± 0,52 a, x |
| I/R + Naringin | 0,00 ± 0,00 c, z | 1,80 ± 0,78 a, y | 1,60 ± 0,84 a, y | 1,10 ± 0,31 b, y |
*a,b,c shows the statistical difference in the same row (a > b > c) (P < 0.001); x,y,z shows the statistical difference in the same column (x > y > z) (P < 0.001). I/R led to increasing neurologic score levels, however, naringin supplementation improved neurologic score levels especially on days 7th and 14th after BCCAo/r