Table 3.
Performance comparison of the proposed hybrid deep learning model and the other existing pre-trained CNN model for each class.
| Deep learning models | Class | Precision | recall | f1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vgg16 | Normal | 98 | 78 | 87 |
| Covid-19 | 61 | 94 | 74 | |
| Vgg19 | Normal | 97 | 73 | 83 |
| Covid-19 | 55 | 93 | 69 | |
| EfficientNetB0 | Normal | 96 | 70 | 81 |
| Covid-19 | 52 | 91 | 66 | |
| ResNet50 | Normal | 98 | 72 | 83 |
| Covid-19 | 55 | 95 | 70 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model (max pooling layer)-NN | Normal | 99 | 88 | 93 |
| Covid-19 | 74 | 98 | 85 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model (average pooling layer)-Naive Bayes | Normal | 89 | 57 | 70 |
| Covid-19 | 40 | 80 | 53 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model(average pooling layer)-Random Forest | Normal | 96 | 65 | 78 |
| Covid-19 | 49 | 93 | 64 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model(average pooling layer)-KNN | Normal | 95 | 60 | 74 |
| Covid-19 | 45 | 91 | 60 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model(average pooling layer)-SVM(RBF) | Normal | 99 | 83 | 90 |
| Covid-19 | 68 | 97 | 80 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model(average pooling layer)-SVM(sigmoid) | Normal | 97 | 80 | 88 |
| Covid-19 | 62 | 94 | 75 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model(average pooling layer)-SVM(linear) | Normal | 99 | 90 | 94 |
| Covid-19 | 77 | 96 | 86 | |
| Hybrid deep learning model (average pooling layer)-NN | Normal | 99 | 90 | 94 |
| Covid-19 | 77 | 97 | 86 |