Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;10(5):e27001. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27001

Table 3.

ADMET analysis of the ligands with better binding characteristics.

Compound name MW NHA NHD LogP NRB GIA LD50 BBB HT AT NLV DL
Stigmasterol 412.702 1 1 7.8008 5 Low 2.54 No No No 1 Yes
Cholest-5-en-3-ol, 24-propylidene-, (3. Beta.)- 426.729 1 1 8.335 6 Low 2.609 No No No 1 Yes
4,22-Stigmastadiene-3-one 410.686 1 0 8.009 5 Low 2.527 No No No 1 Yes
Epi-bicyclosesquiphellandrene 204.357 0 0 4.5811 1 Low 1.56 No No No 1 Yes
γ-Muurolene 204.357 0 0 4.5811 1 Low 1.54 No No No 1 Yes
γ-Cadinene 204.357 0 0 4.5811 1 Low 1.54 No No No 1 Yes
δ-Cadinene 204.357 0 0 4.7252 1 Low 1.552 No No No 1 Yes
β-Cadinene 204.357 0 0 4.5811 1 Low 1.586 No No No 1 Yes
α-Cadinol 222.372 1 1 3.7759 1 High 1.918 Yes No No 0 Yes
δ-Tocotrienol 396.615 2 1 7.98372 9 Low 2.024 No No No 1 Yes
Viridiflorene 204.357 0 0 4.415 0 Low 1.518 No No No 1 Yes
Cis-calamenene 202.341 0 0 4.63192 1 Low 2.069 No No Yes 1 Yes
δ-Selinene 204.357 0 0 4.8693 1 Low 1.647 No No No 1 Yes

MW-molecular weight (g/mol); NHA-no. of hydrogen bond acceptor; NHD-no. of hydrogen bond donor; LogP-predicted octanol/water partition coefficient; NRB- number of rotatable Bond; GIA-gastro intestinal absorption; LD50-median lethal dose; BBB- blood brain barrier; HT-hepatotoxicity; AT- AMES toxicity; NLV- number of Lipinski's violation; DL-drug likeness.