Skip to main content
. 2023 May 17;3:1166753. doi: 10.3389/finsc.2023.1166753

Table 2.

Comparison of nutritional landscapes for lifespan between sexes and lines of C. cosyra selected on age of female oviposition.

Lifespan comparison SSr SSc DF1 DF2 F p value
CT vs US males
Linear 195.573 194.732 2 592 1.28 0.279
Quadratic 161.661 161.147 2 588 0.93 0.392
Correlational 155.836 155.815 1 586 0.08 0.779
CT vs US females
Linear 168.699 166.744 2 592 3.47 0.032A
Quadratic 143.904 142.843 2 588 2.18 0.113
Correlational 139.673 139.558 1 586 0.48 0.487
CT females vs CT males
Linear 133.874 130.844 2 592 5.95 0.003B
Quadratic 100.026 98.955 2 588 3.18 0.042
Correlational 94.123 94.113 1 586 0.03 0.968
US females vs US males
Linear 232.207 230.442 2 592 2.26 0.104
Quadratic 206.340 205.036 2 588 1.87 0.155
Correlational 201.366 201.260 1 586 0.31 0.578

Univariate tests: A Protein: χ2 = 6.87, p = 0.008; Carbohydrate: χ2 = 972.6, p < 0.001. B Protein: χ2 = 42.05, p < 0.001; Carbohydrate: χ2 = 2121.6, p < 0.001.

The analyses were run on results obtained from Experiment I where diets were provided under no-choice conditions.Bold values indicate significant effects (p<0.05).