Table 7.
Diagnostic performance of LAM in combination of 2 other method in EPTB.
| Methods | Results | CRS | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | Kappa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPTB | Non-TB | |||||||
| LAM + Xpert+RNA | positive | 26 | 0 | 61.90%* | 100.00% | 100.00% | 69.81% | 0.604 |
| negative | 16 | 37 | ||||||
| LAM + Xpert+culture | positive | 29 | 0 | 69.05%* | 100.00% | 100.00% | 74.00% | 0.676 |
| negative | 13 | 37 | ||||||
| LAM + Xpert +smear | positive | 27 | 0 | 64.29%* | 100.00% | 100.00% | 71.15% | 0.628 |
| negative | 15 | 37 | ||||||
CRS, composite reference standard; EPTB, extrapulmonary tuberculosis; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; RNA, ribonucleic acid; TB, tuberculosis; LAM, lipoarabinomannan; *p < 0.05, Compared to LAM.