Table 2.
Relationship between UCLA score, kinesiophobia, and all gait parameters of interest (n = 40).
| Predictors | UCLA | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2. TSK | −0.695 P < 0.001 |
||||||
| 3. Peak ADFM |
0.418
P = 0.0007 |
−0.282 P = 0.078 |
|||||
| 4. Peak KFM | 0.110 P = 0.499 |
−0.232 P = 0.149 |
0.216 P = 0.181 |
||||
| 5. Peak HFM |
0.348
P = 0.028 |
−0.227 P = 0.158 |
0.668
P < 0.001 |
0.242 P = 0.132 |
|||
| 6. Peak KAM | 0.188 P = 0.246 |
−0.265 P = 0.099 |
0.149 P = 0.359 |
0.156 P = 0.336 |
0.301 P = 0.059 |
||
| 7. Peak KAM impulse | 0.153 P = 0.345 |
−0.236 P = 0.142 |
0.066 P = 0.687 |
0.091 P = 0.577 |
0.199 P = 0.219 |
0.898
P < 0.001 |
|
| 8. Gait speed |
0.553
P < 0.001 |
−0.342 P = 0.031 |
0.796
P < 0.001 |
0.147 P = 0.366 |
0.573
P < 0.001 |
0.021 P = 0.896 |
−0.087 P = 0.594 |
Note. Spearman’s correlation coefficients with corresponding P values. Statistically significant values are in bold.
Abbreviations: TSK, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia; ADFM, ankle dorsiflexion moment; KFM, knee flexion moment; HFM, hip flexion moment; KAM, knee adduction moment; UCLA, University of California Los Angeles activity scale.