Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Public Health Dent. 2016 Sep 10;77(1):54–62. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12171

Table 2.

Adjusted Odds Ratio for Utilization for a Reported Dental Problem (DP) Among Children Aged 2 to 17 Years with a DP in Past 6 Months – United States, 2008

Full model with interaction term Variables Odds ratio 95% confidence interval P*
Combined effect of Insurance status and dental problem urgency
 No insurance, Urgent versus Non-urgent DP 2.07 0.96–4.46 0.064
 PHND, Urgent versus Non-urgent DP 1.69 1.00–2.84 0.049
 PHD, Urgent versus Non-urgent DP 3.00 2.13–4.23 <0.001
 Medicaid/SCHIP, Urgent versus Non-urgent DP 4.28 2.73–6.71 <0.001
Age (years) 0.054
 2–5 Reference
 6–11 0.98 0.73–1.31
 12–17 1.26 0.96–1.66
Sex 0.691
 Male Reference
 Female 0.96 0.78–1.18
Place of birth 0.754
 US born Reference
 Foreign born 0.92 0.54–1.57
Region 0.020
 South Reference
 Northeast 1.07 0.77–1.48
 Midwest 0.75 0.58–0.98
 West 0.70 0.52–0.95
Race/Ethnicity 0.238
 Hispanic Reference
 NH white 0.80 0.62–1.04
 NH black 0.94 0.68–1.29
Parental education 0.004
 <HS Reference
 HS/GED 1.00 0.68–1.47
 Some college 1.31 0.90 −1.88
 College or higher 1.70 1.13–2.56
Family income <0.001
 <100% Reference
 100–199% 1.26 0.89–1.79
 200–299% 1.72 1.17–2.52
 ≥300% 2.29 1.55–3.39

SCHIP, State Children’s Health Insurance Program; PHD, Private health insurance and private dental insurance; PHND, Private health insurance and no private dental insurance.

*

P values from Wald F test.

Non-Hispanic.