Table 3.

Multivariable multinomial logistic regression results modeling PrEP use and PrEP interest

	Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval), p-value
Variable	Current/Past PrEP Use vs. No Interest in PrEP	Interested in PrEP vs. No Interest in PrEP
Gay and Bisexual Cisgender Males (vs. Cisgender Females/Straight Cisgender Males)	5.25 (1.38, 19.93), p = 0.02	2.22 (0.87, 5.70), p = 0.10
Gender Diverse Persons (vs. Cisgender Females/Straight Cisgender Males)	5.21 (1.41, 19.32), p = 0.01	0.94 (0.29, 3.08), p = 0.92
Number of Days Drank 5 + Alcohol Drinks, Last 30 Days a	0.36 (0.16, 0.86), p = 0.02	0.76 (0.47, 1.22), p = 0.25
Any Sexual Health Service Utilization, Last 3 Months	0.94 (0.33, 2.63), p = 0.90	2.22 (1.03, 4.76), p < 0.05
Know Someone Who Has Used PrEP	5.29 (1.69, 16.57), p = 0.004	2.35 (1.02, 5.39), p < 0.05

Note. p-value for association between PrEP use or interest and participant characteristic, adjusted for all other characteristics, per chi-square test from a multinomial logistic regression modeling the three-level outcome with all four characteristics

^a Tested as displayed in Tables 1 and 2, with ordinal categories 0 days (1), 1–4 days (2), and 5 + days (3)