Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 27;12:1333559. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1333559

Table 2.

Prediction of seroreactivities of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen-based antibody detection.a

C. trachomatis antigen Sensitivity (%) based on different specificityb p value c AUC ± SE e p valuef
Specificity = 90% Specificity = 95% Specificity = 98% Average
Mikrogen 97.9 97.0 95.5 96.8 Ref d 0.993 ± 0.0031 Ref
Pgp3 96.8 95.7 94.1 95.5 0.585 0.986 ± 0.0056 0.207
TmeA 94.3 91.9 88.5 91.6 0.041 0.976 ± 0.0075 0.006
InaC 94.2 92.5 90.2 92.3 0.072 0.969 ± 0.0107 0.005
HSP60 94.3 90.8 85.1 90.0 0.013 0.976 ± 0.0095 0.065

a125 Chlamydia trachomatis NAAT positive and 125 C. trachomatis negative sera from low exposure risk children were used to evaluate the performance of different C. trachomatis antigen-based antibody detection.

bThe sensitivities of each assays at different specificity cutoff values were calculated by ROC analysis.

cComparisons of the average sensitivity was carried out by Student’s t-test.

dMikrogen-CT ELISA was set as reference.

eArea under ROC curve, an AUC value of 0.50 indicates that discrimination of positive from negative data equals random categorization (no discrimination), and an AUC value of 1.0 indicates that prediction is perfect (100% accurate discrimination). SE, standard error.

fComparisons of AUC between assays was carried out by Delong test.