Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 27;11:1371056. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1371056

Table 3.

Difference between unilateral acupuncture (Acu 1) and bilateral acupuncture (Acu 2).

Parameter Estimate Std. Error value of p 95% Confidence Interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Flow Flow S Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 6.08 1.36 < 0.001 3.41 8.75
Flow D Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 11.59 1.34 < 0.001 8.96 14.21
SO2 SO2 S Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 1.32 0.32 < 0.001 0.70 1.94
SO2 D Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 2.08 0.28 < 0.001 1.53 2.63
Velo Velo S Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 0.61 0.18 < 0.001 0.25 0.96
Velo D Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 1.59 0.19 < 0.001 1.22 1.97
rHb rHb S Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 1.45 0.27 < 0.001 0.93 1.98
rHb D Acu 2 vs. Acu 1 2.76 0.45 < 0.001 1.87 3.64

Acu 1, unilateral acupuncture, Acu 2, bilateral acupuncture, p value: <0.05 statistical significance showed in bold.