Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;15:2208. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46550-y

Table 1.

Optimization study

graphic file with name 41467_2024_46550_Taba_HTML.gif
Entry Precursor Ligand Yield (%)a Z/E ratiob
1 CoCl2 CNC-H 0
2 CoCl2 CNC-Me 71% 3:97
3 CoCl2 CNC-Et 78% 36:64
4 CoCl2 CNC-iPr 99% 2:98
5 CoCl2 CNC-tBu 7% <1:99
6 CoCl2 CNC-Mes 0
7c CoCl2 CNC-iPr 99% 96:4
8d CoCl2 CNC-iPr 70% >99:1
9e CoCl2 CNC-iPr 45% 97:3
10e Co(acac)2 CNC-iPr 98% 51:49
11f Co(acac)2 CNC-iPr 99% (90%)g 98:2
12f,h Co(acac)2 CNC-iPr 98% (90%)g >99:1

Reaction conditions: CoCl2 (5.0 mol%), 1a (0.4 mmol, 1.0 equiv), ligand (5.0 mol%),

tBuOK (20.0 mol%), HBpin (3.0 equiv), DMF (2 ml), room temperature (r.t.), N2 atmosphere, 12 h.

aNMR yield determined using methylene bromide as the internal standard.

bZ/E ratio based on 1H NMR analysis.

cReacted for 10 min.

dHBpin used in 1.5 equiv., 24 h.

eCo precursor (0.2 mol%), ligand (0.22 mol%),

tBuOK(0.8 mol%), DMF (1 ml).

fCo(acac)2 (0.1 mol%), ligand (0.14 mol%),

tBuOK(0.56 mol%), DMF (0.5 ml).

gIsolated yield.

hHBpin (1.3 equiv.).