Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):e3454. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3454

TABLE 3.

Between‐groups functional connectivity analysis results.

Group comparison
Cognitively intact (= 11) vs. posterior‐cortical (= 19) Cognitively intact (= 11) vs. healthy controls (= 20) Healthy controls (= 20) vs. posterior‐cortical (= 19)
ROI Hip (L) Hip (R) Hip (L) Hip (R) Hip (L) Hip (R)
Anterior temporal FC (L) ns ns ns ns ns = 3.56, p = .002
Anterior temporal FC (R) = −3.28, p = .009 ns ns ns T = 4.47, p < .001 = 3.61, p = .002
Posterior temporal FC (L) Ns ns ns ns = 4.90, p < .001 = 4.46, p < .001
Posterior temporal FC (R) ns ns ns ns T = 4.52, p < .001 T = 5.31, p < .001
Temporo‐occipital FC (L) ns ns ns ns = 5.30, p < .001 = 4.74, p < .001
Temporo‐occipital FC (R) ns ns ns ns = 5.59, p < .001 = 4.14, p < .001
Occipital FC (L) ns ns ns ns = 6.06, p < .001 = 4.38, p < .001
Occipital FC (R) ns ns ns ns T = 5.45, p < .001 = 3.51, p = .002
IFG opercularis (L) ns ns ns ns ns ns
IFG triangularis (L) Ns ns ns ns Ns ns

Abbreviations: FC, fusiform cortex; Hip, hippocampus; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ns, nonsignificant; p, FDR‐adjusted p‐value; ROIs, regions of interest.