Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 19;12(6):539–549. doi: 10.1159/000529143

Table 5.

Cox regression analysis for prediction of OS in 245 patients with single large HCC

Variables Univariable analysis
Multivariable analysis
HR (95% Cl) p value HR (95% Cl) p value
Age, 1 year increase 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 0.262 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.944
Male (vs. female) 1.04 (0.61–1.78) 0.880 1.10 (0.63–1.92) 0.730
FlB-4 index, 1 point increase 1.14 (1.07–1.21) <0.001 1.05 (0.97–1.14) 0.201
ALBl score, 1 point increase 3.60 (2.46–5.26) <0.001 2.49 (1.52–4.07) <0.001
AFP, 1 ng/mL increase 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 0.607
HBV positive (vs. negative) 1.19 (0.78–1.81) 0.415
HCV positive (vs. negative) 1.28 (0.79–2.07) 0.319
Cirrhosis (vs. no) 1.39 (0.91–2.11) 0.124
Seven-eleven criteria
 Low tumor burden 1 1
 Intermediate tumor burden 1.20 (0.71–2.01) 0.493 1.27 (0.75–2.15) 0.372
 High tumor burden 2.05 (1.17–3.57) 0.012 1.86 (1.01–3.41) 0.046
SR versus TACE 0.35 (0.23–0.54) <0.001 0.57 (0.35–0.93) 0.023

OS, overall survival; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HR, hazard ratio; Cl, confidence interval; FIB-4 index, fibrosis-4 index; ALBI score, albumin-bilirubin score; AFP, a-fetoprotein; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; SR, surgical resection; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization.