Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 15;7:33. doi: 10.21037/aoj-22-14

Table 2. The operative comparison between the obese and non-obese groups.

Operative factors Obese group Non-obese group Statistical significance (P value)
Number of levels fused 10.1 (SD 3.2) 9.6 (SD 3.1) 0.600
Number of levels decompressed 1.1 (SD 1.4) 0.8 (SD 1.3) 0.446
Operative time (minutes) 282.1 (SD 140.4) 319.5 (SD 161.3) 0.351
Estimated blood loss (mL) 1,916.0 (SD 1,032.0) 1,099.0 (SD 694.2) 0.001*
ICU length of stay (hours) 32 (SD 31.7) 29.5 (SD 37.2) 0.784
Hospital length of stay (days) 13.2 (SD 13.4) 11.3 (SD 3.2) 0.451
Surgical approach
   Posterior 29 (96.7%) 28 (93.3%)
   Anterior 0 0
   Combined 1 (3.3%) 2 (6.7%)
Osteotomy
   Any osteotomy 16 (53.3%) 14 (46.7%) 0.613
   3 column osteotomy 4 (13.3%) 4 (13.3%) 1.0
6 months radiographic parameters
   Major cobb 16.1 (SD 9.4) 17 (SD 8.7) 0.988
   Coronal balance 23.4 (SD 16.5) 16.2 (SD 11.8) 0.120
   Sagittal balance 45.3 (SD 40.9) 19.3 (SD 33.1) 0.034*
   PI-LL mismatch 8.9 (SD 16.8) 7.7 (SD 11.1) 0.778

*, P<0.05. ICU, intensive care unit; PI-LL, pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis.