Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 15;16(4):3596–3611. doi: 10.18632/aging.205547

Table 1. Summary results of MR (target gut microbiome on esophageal cancer).

Taxa Exposure Outcome Nsnp Methods Beta SE OR (95%CI) P-value Heterogeneity Horizontal pleiotrop
Cochran’s Q P-value Egger intercept P MR-PRESSO P
Family Porphyromonadaceae Esophageal cancer 9 Inverse variance weighted -0.432 0.219 0.65 (0.42-0.99) 0.048 6.708 0.568 0.279 0.6
Genus Candidatus Soleaferrea Esophageal cancer 11 Inverse variance weighted -0.248 0.125 0.78 (0.61-0.99) 0.048 10.878 0.367 0.594 0.38
Genus Catenibacterium Esophageal cancer 5 Inverse variance weighted 0.196 0.134 1.31 (1.01- 1.71) 0.044 1.795 0.773 0.924 0.78
Genus Eubacterium coprostanoligenes Esophageal cancer 13 Inverse variance weighted 0.355 0.171 1.43 (1.02-2.00) 0.038 9.402 0.668 0.718 0.68
Genus Marvinbryantia Esophageal cancer 10 Inverse variance weighted 0.340 0.173 1.41 (1.01-1.97) 0.049 3.315 0.950 0.813 0.97
Genus Ruminococcaceae UCG010 Esophageal cancer 6 Inverse variance weighted 0.466 0.220 1.59 (1.03- 2.46) 0.034 2.971 0.704 0.863 0.69
Genus Ruminococcus1 Esophageal cancer 10 Inverse variance weighted 0.381 0.192 1.46 (1.01-2.13) 0.047 7.057 0.631 0.090 0.62
Genus Sutterella Esophageal cancer 12 Inverse variance weighted 0.414 0.166 1.51 (1.09-2.10) 0.012 6.918 0.805 0.116 0.93