Table 1. Summary results of MR (target gut microbiome on esophageal cancer).
Taxa | Exposure | Outcome | Nsnp | Methods | Beta | SE | OR (95%CI) | P-value | Heterogeneity | Horizontal pleiotrop | ||
Cochran’s Q | P-value | Egger intercept P | MR-PRESSO P | |||||||||
Family | Porphyromonadaceae | Esophageal cancer | 9 | Inverse variance weighted | -0.432 | 0.219 | 0.65 (0.42-0.99) | 0.048 | 6.708 | 0.568 | 0.279 | 0.6 |
Genus | Candidatus Soleaferrea | Esophageal cancer | 11 | Inverse variance weighted | -0.248 | 0.125 | 0.78 (0.61-0.99) | 0.048 | 10.878 | 0.367 | 0.594 | 0.38 |
Genus | Catenibacterium | Esophageal cancer | 5 | Inverse variance weighted | 0.196 | 0.134 | 1.31 (1.01- 1.71) | 0.044 | 1.795 | 0.773 | 0.924 | 0.78 |
Genus | Eubacterium coprostanoligenes | Esophageal cancer | 13 | Inverse variance weighted | 0.355 | 0.171 | 1.43 (1.02-2.00) | 0.038 | 9.402 | 0.668 | 0.718 | 0.68 |
Genus | Marvinbryantia | Esophageal cancer | 10 | Inverse variance weighted | 0.340 | 0.173 | 1.41 (1.01-1.97) | 0.049 | 3.315 | 0.950 | 0.813 | 0.97 |
Genus | Ruminococcaceae UCG010 | Esophageal cancer | 6 | Inverse variance weighted | 0.466 | 0.220 | 1.59 (1.03- 2.46) | 0.034 | 2.971 | 0.704 | 0.863 | 0.69 |
Genus | Ruminococcus1 | Esophageal cancer | 10 | Inverse variance weighted | 0.381 | 0.192 | 1.46 (1.01-2.13) | 0.047 | 7.057 | 0.631 | 0.090 | 0.62 |
Genus | Sutterella | Esophageal cancer | 12 | Inverse variance weighted | 0.414 | 0.166 | 1.51 (1.09-2.10) | 0.012 | 6.918 | 0.805 | 0.116 | 0.93 |