Skip to main content
. 2023 Nov 28;48(11):1686–1695. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2023.230334

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical data between the laparoscopy group and the open surgery group

Groups n Age*/years 2018 FIGO staging†/[No.(%)] Pathological type†/[No.(%)]
IA1 with lymphovascular invasion IA2 IB1 Squamous carcinoma Adenocarcinoma Adenosquamous carcinoma
Laparoscopy 45 49.06±8.94 5(11.1) 4(8.9) 36(80.0) 34(75.6) 9(20.0) 2(4.4)
Open surgery 16 49.38±7.83 0(0.0) 1(6.2) 15(93.8) 13(81.2) 3(18.8) 0(0.0)
t/χ 2 0.122 2.145 0.770
P 0.610 0.342 0.680
Groups Lymphovascular space invasion‡/[No.(%)] Stromal invasion‡/[No.(%)] Postoperative adjuvant treatment‡/[No.(%)] Type of surgery‡/[No.(%)]
Positive Negative Positive Negative None Radiotherapy and chemotherapy QM-B type QM-C type
Laparoscopy 10(22.2) 35(77.8) 10(22.2) 35(77.8) 38(84.4) 7(15.6) 9(20.0) 36(80.0)
Open surgery 3(18.8) 13(81.2) 2(12.5) 14(87.5) 15(93.8) 1(6.2) 1(6.2) 15(93.8)
t 0.085 0.706 0.897 1.628
P 1.000 0.635 0.606 0.267

*Data are expressed as the mean±standard deviation and T-test is used. †Chi-squared test is used. ‡Fisher’s exact test is used. FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.