Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;16(5):979. doi: 10.3390/cancers16050979

Table 3.

Factors associated with RFS and OS.

RFS OS
Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value
Age
≥70 vs. <70 3.6 (2.0–6.4) <0.001 3.4 (1.9–6.1) <0.001 3.0 (1.5–5.9) <0.001 2.9 (1.5–5.8) 0.002
Sex
M vs. F 1.2 (0.7–2.2) 0.485 1.2 (0.6–2.4) 0.517
Tumor location
M vs. U 1.0 (0.5–2.1) 0.991 1.4 (0.6–3.1) 0.416
L vs. U 0.8 (0.4–1.7) 0.559 0.9 (0.4–2.1) 0.821
Differentiation
Undifferntiated vs. Differentiated 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.126 0.6 (0.3–1.2) 0.163
Depth
SM1 vs. M 1.0 (0.5–2.0) 0.931 0.9 (0.4–1.9) 0.720
Tumor size
>20 mm vs. ≤20 mm 1.5 (0.8–2.9) 0.221 1.8 (0.9–3.7) 0.106
Ulcer finding
Presence vs. Absence 1.3 (0.6–3.0) 0.535 1.6 (0.7–3.7) 0.313
Lymph node metastasis
Presence vs. Absence 6.2 (3.2–12.2) <0.001 —— —— 5.2 (2.4–11.2) <0.001 —— ——
Lymphovascular invasion
Presence vs. Absence 4.8 (2.6–8.9) <0.001 4.5 (2.4–8.6) <0.001 4.8 (2.4–9.6) <0.001 4.7 (2.3–9.4) <0.001
Nerve Invasion
Presence vs. Absence 4.1 (1.0–16.9) 0.050 2.7 (0.4–19.5) 0.331