Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 12.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Immunol. 2021 May 14;71:34–45. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2021.04.002

Table 3.

Psychometric properties examined in studies establishing childhood vaccine confidence measures

Vaccine confidence measure, year published Factor structure Internal consistency reliability Test-retest reliability Cognitive interviewing Convergent and discriminant validity Criterion validity

The Immunisation Beliefs and Intentions Measure (IBIM), 2010 [30] a
Parent Attitudes about Childhood Vaccines (PACV) survey, 2011 [19,20,31,4956]
Vaccine Confidence Scale (VCS), 2014 [32,57,58] b
Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (VCBS), 2014 [33] b
Concerns, attitudes, beliefs and intentions of parents about vaccines for their child (CABI-V), 2015 [35] a
Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS), 2015 [36,37,5961] b
Vaccination Scale (VS), 2015 [38]
Vaccine Confidence Project, 2016 [39]
Vaccination Psychological Empowerment Scale (VPES), 2017 [40,41]
The Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale, 2017 [42,62]
5C Antecedents of Vaccine Acceptance (5C), 2018 [43] b
Vaccine Acceptance Instrument (VAI), 2018 [44]
Caregiver Vaccination Attitudes Scale (CVAS), 2019 [45]
Emory Vaccine Confidence Index (EVCI), 2019 [46]

Note. ✔ = Examined in at least one study. ✖ = Not examined. Internal consistency reliability: Examined a measure of the average correlations between pairs of items in the measure. Test-retest reliability: Examined the correlation of the measure administered at two different times. Cognitive interviewing: Used cognitive interviewing techniques to see whether participants assigned the same meaning to the items that researchers intended (see Table 1). Convergent and discriminant validity: Examined whether the measure correlated with conceptually similar scales and not with conceptually unrelated measures. Criterion validity: Examined the correlation of the measure with vaccination intention or behaviour. These definitions came primarily from two sources [47,48]. The codes are based on two coders independent evaluation of the studies. Supplementary Material S2 provides more information on the measures’ reliability and validity. Factor structure: Examined whether the measure had subscales.

a

Measure added to our review based on expert feedback.

b

Measure that authors of this review developed.