Skip to main content
Neuropsychopharmacology Reports logoLink to Neuropsychopharmacology Reports
. 2023 Dec 8;44(1):109–114. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12398

The clinical efficacy of Olibanum gum chewing in patients with Mild‐to‐Moderate Alzheimer disease: A randomized Parallel‐Design controlled trial

Fereshteh Ghorat 1, Mahdi Sepidarkish 2, Farzaneh Saadattalab 1, Maedeh Rezghi 3, Shamim Shahrestani 4, Maryam Gholamalizadeh 5, Saeid Doaei 6,✉
PMCID: PMC10932771  PMID: 38069542

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer's disease is a common neurodegenerative disorder in elderly with progressive decline in cognitive functions. This study aimed to investigate the possible memory‐improving effects of Olibanum on patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Research Design and Method

This double‐blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out on 72 participants aged 50–75 years. The intervention group (n = 36) received 1.6 g/day of olibanum chewing gum for 18 weeks. The placebo group (n = 36) received chewing gum without olibanum. Neuropsychological assessments were performed at baseline, every 4 weeks, and after 18 weeks of the intervention.

Results

There was no significant difference between (MD: 0.84, 95%CI: −1.10 to 2.78, p = 0.392) at baseline. Both groups had linear improvements over time. There was no significant difference between two groups regarding the improvements after the intervention (F = 0.157, p = 0.693). There were no significant differences between the groups for MMSE score (Mini‐Mental State Examination) after the intervention (F = 0.141, p = 0.708).

Conclusions

This study revealed that 18 weeks of gum chewing with Olibanum did not change the neuropsychological status. More clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: alzheimer's disease, gum chewing, memory loss, Olibanum, persian medicine


The mean score of Wechsler memory scale (WMS) in the intervention and placebo groups during 18 weeks of the sudy.

graphic file with name NPR2-44-109-g003.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Neurodegenerative diseases such as cognitive disorders are among the diseases that increase with age. It is predicted that by 2050, the number of elderly people will increase to 152 million and the rate of aging will reach 37.5%. Cognitive disorder is a type of disease that can impair attention, memory, and performance. 1 Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by memory loss and personality changes, eventually leading to dementia. 1 Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality and the most common cause of dementia worldwide. 2 About 121 499 deaths were recorded from AD in 2019, the latest year for which data are available. Alzheimer's disease was officially listed as the sixth‐leading cause of death in the United States in 2019 and the seventh‐leading cause of death in 2020 and 2021, when COVID‐19 entered the ranks of the top 10 causes of death. 3 Regardless of the increasing prevalence of AD due to the world's aging population and related health problems, there are no effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of this disease. 3 Many studies have reported that higher levels of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin‐1, interleukin −6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) in AD patients impair memory and learning performance. 4

Recent studies reported that herbal compounds may have a beneficial effect on improvement of inflammatory diseases such as osteoarthritis, 5 psychological disorders, 6 and inflammatory bowel disease. 7 Several studies have also demonstrated the effectiveness of herbal medicines in memory‐related disorders. 3 , 8 Effectiveness of saffron extract and crocin have been reported on recognition and spatial memory after chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in rats. 9 In addition, Foroumandi et al. reported that fenugreek seed extract supplementation improved memory function in patients with Alzheimer's disease. 10

Olibanum gum resin, known as Frankincense, is one from the family Burseraceae and the genus Boswellia. 11 Olibanum gum resin was recognized as an herbal component with positive effects on neuroinflammation diseases. 12 The extract of Boswellia species contains a broad variety of different components such as acid resin, gum, alpha‐boswellic acid, 3‐acetyl‐beta‐boswellic acid, 4‐O‐methyl‐glucuronic acid, incensole acetate and phellandrene. 13 Olibanum and its active components might be useful in improving cognitive dysfunction and memory impairment. 12 , 13 , 14

Olibanum in Iranian traditional medicine is called Kundur and is known as a remedy for various memory and learning disorders. 15 Recent in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that boswellic acid may improve memory function in rats. 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 The administration of boswellic acid was reported to improve memory impairment induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats. 20 However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical trial that evaluated the effect of Olibanum on memory function. Based on this evidence, the present clinical trial was aimed to investigate the possible memory‐improving effects of Olibanum on patients with AD.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial to assess the memory‐improving efficacy of Olibanum chewing gum in patients with mild to moderate AD.

2.1. Participants

This study included 72 participants aged 50–75 years. All surveys conducted in the rural Health Centers of Sabzevar, Iran. Inclusion criteria was having mild to moderate AD, not receiving a supplement or diet containing olibanum and consent to participate. Exclusion criteria was significant neurologic or psychiatric disease, serious gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, endocrine or cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal or significant obstructive pulmonary disorders, other diseases which could lead to dementia other than AD, pregnancy, inability to using chewing gum, using any treatments which probably improve cognitive function within the past 1 month or during study. The Patients who were unable to continue the study were also excluded from study.

The screening process consisted of several phases to identify patients with probable mild to moderate AD. In the first phase, demographic information of the participants was collected and those who had 20–27 points of Mini‐Mental State Examination Persian Version (F‐ MMSE) scores were included. In addition, all patients were required to meet the criteria for mild to moderate AD based on the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM‐V). In the second phase, the selected participants were assessed using Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in order to exclude depressive pseudodementia. In the third phase, patients were confirmed by a neurologist based on medical history and nervous system medical examination.

2.2. Interventions

Participants were allocated 1:1 to either the Olibanum chewing gum or placebo group, using a blocked randomization method by a computer‐generated sequence. All participants and researchers were blinded to the group assignment. Participants allocated to the intervention group received 1.6 g/day of Olibanum chewing gum for 18 weeks. Participants were instructed to chew one Olibanum chewing gum for 20 min three times a day. Each Olibanum chewing gum contained 100 mg of Olibanum (Biodent chewing gum; Masterfoodeh Co., Iran). The placebo group received chewing gum without Olibanum that were identical in appearance to the Olibanum chewing gum. A relatively low dose of Olibanum was assessed in this study due to lack of data on the safety of Olibanum for older adults. Participants were recommended to follow their usual dietary and activity patterns. Olibanum chewing gum and placebo were assessed and confirmed regarding the composition and absence of contaminants (Consumer Lab, Tehran, IR). The cognitive abilities of patients were evaluated in baseline, every 4 weeks, and after 18 weeks using neuropsychological tests.

2.3. Outcome measures

The primary outcome measure was Wechsler memory scale (WMS‐III), which is a test to assess basic and instrumental activities of daily living composed of 6 primary and 5 optional subtests. 21 The second outcome measure was MMSE, which consists of 20 tasks to assess multiple cognitive domains including memory, language, praxis, and orientation. 22 In this study, the standardized Persian version of MMSE and WMS‐III were used. 23 The safety parameters were assessed using serious adverse events (SAEs) and spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs).

2.4. Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SD or frequencies and percentages. The Chi‐squared test and independent samples t‐test were used for the comparison of the qualitative and quantitative variables between the intervention and control groups, respectively. Efficacy outcome parameters were analyzed on an intent‐to‐treat basis. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of the intervention. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software version 21 and the p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. RESULTS

Recruitment of the patients commenced in June 2018 and ended in June 2019. A total number of 106 patients were assessed from which 26 were not eligible according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eight eligible patients were not willing to participate. Finally, 72 patients were randomized into the study groups (36 in each group). During the 6 months of the study, one patient was lost to follow‐up (Figure 1). Demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. No statistically significant differences were observed among two groups regarding the baseline characteristics.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Flow diagram.

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of the study population.

Frankincense (n = 36) Placebo (n = 35) p‐value
Age (year) a 56.61 ± (5.64) 54.71 ± (4.25) 0.115
Sex b
Male 6 (16.7) 11 (31.4) 0.145
Female 30 (83.3) 24 (68.6)
Marital status b
Married 31 (86.1) 32 (91.4) 0.564
Wife's death 5 (13.9) 3 (8.6)
Education level b
Illiterate 20 (55.55) 22 (62.9) 0.853
Primary school 5 (13.88) 5 (14.3)
High school 11 (30.55) 8 (22.9)
Employment status b
Employed 9 (25) 11 (31.4) 0.547
Non‐employment 27 (75) 24 (68.6)
Other underlying illnesses b
Yes 16 (44.4) 10(28.6) 0.165
No 20 (55.6) 25 (71.4)
a

Values given as mean ± SD (standard deviation).

b

Values given as number (percentage).

The mean score of WMS and MMSE for the groups from baseline to week 18 are presented in Figures 2 and 3. The mean pretreatment scores of WMS in the intervention and placebo groups were 44.92 ± (3.7) and 45.76 ± (4.48), respectively (MD: 0.84, 95%CI: −1.10 to 2.78, p = 0.392). The two groups had similar scores at the baseline, and then both made linear improvements over time. However, there was no significant difference between two groups from pretreatment toward end of treatment (F (1, 67) = 0.157, p = 0.693). No group‐by‐time interaction was found for the score of WMS (F (1, 67) = 1.56, p = 0.216). For the secondary end point (MMSE), the results showed that both groups improved slightly from pretreatment toward end of treatment, but there were no significant differences between the groups (F (1, 67) = 0.141, p = 0.708). No group‐by‐time interaction was found for the score of MMSE (F (1, 67) = 1.84, p = 0.179).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Mean of wechsler memory scale III from baseline over time.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Mean of mini‐mental status examination from baseline over time.

4. DISCUSSION

In this study, we assess the effect of olibanum gum chewing in AD patients compared to placebo (gum chewing without olibanum). We found that the patients in both groups who had used gum chewing with or without Olibanum had better results after an 18 weeks treatment period; however, this difference in the intervention group was not significant compared to the control group. Previously, physiological studies confirmed the effect of Olibanum on improvement of learning and memory. 4 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 24 Although clinical study on the effect of olibanum on AD is scarce, Beheshti et al. reported the effect of olibanum in a rat model of AD. 17 In addition, an inclusive review focused on the significance of olibanum metabolites indicated that the anti‐inflammatory and anti‐AD effects of Olibanum may be associated with the intriguing biological and pharmacological potentials of Olibanum. 25

The exact mechanisms of the possible effects of Olibanum on AD is not yet clear. During inflammatory responses, the release of inflammatory cytokines including interleukin‐1 beta (IL‐1β), IL‐6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF‐α) is increased in the brain. 4 These inflammatory cytokines directly affect neuronal functions including long‐term potentiation (LTP), glutamate release, AMPA receptor density, and cellular signaling pathways involved in memory. 4 There is also evidence that oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) impair memory and learning. 5 Olibanum was reported to have anti‐inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective effects. 26

The chemical analysis of oleo‐gum resin water extract of Boswellia dalzielii (Burseraceae) demonstrated the presence of total phenols, flavonoids, anthocyanins and tannins. Tannin‐rich plants have been proven to have anti‐inflammatory properties. 12 , 19 Afsar et al. showed that the methanol fraction of B. serrata leaves contains high amounts of total phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins and exhibited strong in vitro anti‐inflammatory activity. 27 Methanol extract of the resin of B. carterii exhibited marked anti‐inflammatory activity for their inhibitory effect against 12‐O‐tetradecanoylphorbol‐13‐acetate (TPA)‐induced inflammation in mice. In addition, anti‐inflammatory effects of B. elongate have been frequently reported. 28 , 29 , 30 , 31

The resin of Boswellia serrata has shown a beneficial effect on treatment of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, bronchial asthma osteoarthritis, and chronic colitis. 26 More than 200 constituents of Olibanum may be responsible for therapeutic properties against inflammatory diseases 32 . For example, the triterpenoids such as pentacyclic triterpenoid are known to have anti‐inflammatory effects 33 . Olibanum inhibits inflammation in many inflammatory diseases by specifically inhibiting 5‐lipooxygenase enzyme, preventing leukotriene synthesis and stopping glycosaminoglycan production. 6 According to some evidence obtained by animal studies, Olibanum and its constituent, boswellic acid have obvious positive effects on neuroinflammation diseases and they could be useful in improving a variety of models of cognitive dysfunction and memory impairment caused by hypothyroidism, diabetes, seizure, and stroke. 7 Olibanum is traditionally used in Iran for pregnant women during the first trimester to enhance the learning ability of the child. 34

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial that investigated the effect of Olibanum on memory function. We failed to find any association between Olibanum and AD. However, this study had some limitations. Since this study was the first clinical trial to assess the effect of olibanum on human participants with AD, we use minimal dose in chewing gum in order to avoid the possible side effects. Another limitation was selecting chewing gum for the placebo group. Several studies demonstrated the effects of chewing on cognitive improvement. 35 , 36 The positive effect of chewing gum on cognition in both groups may influence the results.

5. CONCLUSION

The result of this study indicates that the use of olibanum (1.6 g/day) as chewing gum compared to chewing gum without olibanum had no significant effect on AD. Future studies with higher doses of olibanum and on larger samples are warranted to investigate the effect of olibanum on AD.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

SD, FGH, MS, FS, MR, and SHSH designed the study, and were involved in the data collection, analysis, and drafting of the manuscript. MGH and SD were involved in the design of the study, analysis of the data, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

Funding for this study was provided by Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran. (6655).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study protocol had been approved by the Research Ethical Committee of Sabzevar University of medical sciences, Sabzevar, Iran (Medsab.Rec.96.1). The trial protocol had been registered in the Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT) (ID: IRCT2017060918951N3).

INFORMED CONSENT

The present study followed the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants.

REGISTRY AND REGISTRATION NUMBER OF STUDY/TRIAL

Clinical trial registration number: ID: IRCT2017060918951N3.

ANIMAL STUDIES

Not applicable.

Supporting information

Data S1.

NPR2-44-109-s002.pdf (617KB, pdf)

Data S2.

NPR2-44-109-s001.xlsx (28.1KB, xlsx)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are thankful to Masterfoodeh Company (Iran) and Iranian traditional medicine association for providing necessary facilities for the preparation of this study.

Ghorat F, Sepidarkish M, Saadattalab F, Rezghi M, Shahrestani S, Gholamalizadeh M, et al. The clinical efficacy of Olibanum gum chewing in patients with Mild‐to‐Moderate Alzheimer disease: A randomized Parallel‐Design controlled trial. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2024;44:109–114. 10.1002/npr2.12398

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are made available in the Supplementary Material of this article (Data S1 and Data S2) following approval by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (ID: IRCT2017060918951N3).

REFERENCES

  • 1. Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, Holstege H, Chételat G, Teunissen CE, et al. Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1577–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Eratne D, Loi SM, Farrand S, Kelso W, Velakoulis D, Looi JC. Alzheimer's disease: clinical update on epidemiology, pathophysiology and diagnosis. Australas Psychiatry. 2018;26(4):347–357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Choi Y, Kim AR, Lee JY, Kim HS, Yang C, Kim JK, et al. Herbal medicine for patients with cognitive impairment: an observational study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021;17:3183–3194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Khajehdehi M, Khalaj‐Kondori M, Baradaran B. Molecular evidences on anti‐inflammatory, anticancer, and memory‐boosting effects of frankincense. Phytother Res. 2022;36(3):1194–1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Azizi F, Ghorat F, Rakhshani MH, Rad M. Comparison of the effect of topical use of nigella sativa oil and diclofenac gel on osteoarthritis pain in older people: a randomized, double‐blind, clinical trial. Journal of Herbal Medicine. 2019;16:100259. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tabaraei Y, Khalili H. The effect of inhalation of matricaria chamomile essential oil on patients' anxiety before esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Govaresh. 2018;22(4):232–238. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Li Y, Yang S, Jin X, Li D, Lu J, Wang X, et al. Mitochondria as novel mediators linking gut microbiota to atherosclerosis that is ameliorated by herbal medicine: a review. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Khan S, Barve KH, Kumar MS. Recent advancements in pathogenesis, diagnostics and treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2020;18(11):1106–1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hosseinzadeh H, Sadeghnia HR, Ghaeni FA, Motamedsh‐ariaty VS, Mohajeri SA. Effects of saffron (crocus sativusL.) and its active constituent, crocin, on recognition and spatial memory after chronic cerebral hypoperfusion inrats. Phytother Res. 2012;26(3):381–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Foroumandi E, Javan R, Moayed L, Fahimi H, Kheirabadi F, Neamatshahi M, et al. The effects of fenugreek seed extract supplementation in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Phytother Res. 2023;37(1):285–294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Al‐Yasiry AR, Kiczorowska B. Frankincense–therapeutic properties. Postepy Hig Med Dosw (Online). 2016;70:380–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Marefati N, Beheshti F, Memarpour S, Rezaei M, Hosseini M. The effects of pre‐treatment with olibanum and its constituent, boswellic acid on synaptic plasticity impairments induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats. Avicenna J Phytomed. 2021;11(1):68–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Ameen AM, Elkazaz AY, Mohammad HM, Barakat BM. Anti‐inflammatory and neuroprotective activity of boswellic acids in rotenone parkinsonian rats. CAN J Physiol Pharma. 2017;95:819–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Hamedi A, Pasdaran A, Zebarjad Z, Moein M. A survey on chemical constituents and indications of aromatic waters soft drinks (hydrosols) used in Persian nutrition culture and folk medicine for neurological disorders and mental health. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2017;22(4):744–752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hosseini M, Shafei MN, Safari V, Taiarani Z, Kafami Ladani M, Sadeghian R. The effects of olibanum administered to methimazole‐treated dams during lactation on learning and memory of offspring rats. Nat Prod Res. 2012;26(16):1544–1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Marefati N, Beheshti F, Mokhtari‐Zaer A, Shafei MN, Salmani H, Sadeghnia HR, et al. The effects of Olibanum on oxidative stress indicators, cytokines, brain derived neurotrophic factor and memory in lipopolysaccharide challenged rats. Toxin Reviews. 2022;41(1):129–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Beheshti S, Aghaie R. Therapeutic effect of frankincense in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease. AJP. 2016;6:468–480. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang Z, Chen W, Luan J, Chen D, Liu L, Feng X. Ameliorative effects of olibanum essential oil on learning and memory in Aβ1‐42‐induced Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Trop. J. Pharm. Res. 2020;19(8):1643–1651. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Czerniawski J, Miyashita T, Lewandowski G, Guzowski JF. Systemic lipopolysaccharide administration impairs retrieval of context–object discrimination, but not spatial, memory: evidence for selective disruption of specific hippocampus‐dependent memory functions during acute neuroinflammation. Brain Behav Immun. 2015;44:159–166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Marefati N, Beheshti F, Memarpour S, Bayat R, Shafei MN, Sadeghnia HR, et al. The effects of acetyl‐11‐keto‐β‐boswellic acid on brain cytokines and memory impairment induced by lipopolysaccharide in rats. Cytokine. 2020;131:155107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Wechsler D. The Wechsler memory scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp (Harcourt); 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini‐mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Seyedian M, Falah M, Nourouzian M, Neiat S, Delavar A, Ghasemzadeh HA. Validity of the Farsi Version of Mini‐Mental State Examination.
  • 24. Jebelli A, Khalaj‐Kondori M, Bonyadi M, Hosseinpour Feizi MA, Rahmati‐Yamchi M. Beta‐Boswellic acid and ethanolic extract of Olibanum regulating the expression levels of CREB‐1 and CREB‐2 genes. Iran. J Pharm Res. 2019;18(2):877–886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Hussain H, Rashan L, Hassan U, Abbas M, Hakkim FL, Green IR. Frankincense diterpenes as a bio‐source for drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2022;17(5):513–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Gong Y, Jiang X, Yang S, Huang Y, Hong J, Ma Y, et al. The biological activity of 3‐O‐Acetyl‐11‐keto‐β‐Boswellic acid in nervous system diseases. Neuromolecular Med. 2022;24(4):374–384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Afsar V, Reddy YM, Saritha K. In vitro antioxidant activity and anti‐inflammatory activity of methanolic leaf extract of Boswellia serrata. Int J Life Sci Biotechnol Pharma Res. 2012;1(4):15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Kim H, Banerjee N, Ivanov I, Pfent CM, Prudhomme KR, Bisson WH, et al. Comparison of anti‐inflammatory mechanisms of mango (Mangifera Indica L.) and pomegranate (Punica Granatum L.) in a preclinical model of colitis. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(9):1912–1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Mothana RA. Anti‐inflammatory, antinociceptive and antioxidant activities of the endemic Soqotraen Boswellia elongata Balf. f. and Jatropha unicostata Balf. f. in different experimental models. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49(10):2594–2599. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Asadi E, Shahabı Kaseb MR, Zeıdabadı R, Hamedınıa MR. Effect of 4 weeks of frankincense consumption on explicit motor memory and serum BDNF in elderly men. Turk J Med Sci. 2019;49(4):1033–1040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Mohamed EA, Ahmed HI, Zaky HS, Badr AM. Boswellic acids ameliorate neurodegeneration induced by AlCl3: the implication of Wnt/β‐catenin pathway. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(50):76135–76143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Hosseini M, Hadjzadeh MA‐R, Derakhshan M, Havakhah S, Rassouli FB, Rakhshandeh H, et al. The beneficial effects of olibanum on memory deficit induced by hypothyroidism in adult rats tested in Morris water maze. Arch Pharm Res. 2010;33(3):463–468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Gomaa AA, Makboul RM, Al‐Mokhtar MA, Nicola MA. Polyphenol‐rich Boswellia serrata gum prevents cognitive impairment and insulin resistance of diabetic rats through inhibition of GSK3β activity, oxidative stress and pro‐inflammatory cytokines. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;109:281–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ghorat F, Ghafarzadeh R, Jafarzadeh ER. Perinatal mortality and its associated risk factors: a study in the north‐east of Iran. Ira J Neonatol. 2016;7(1):47–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Hirano Y, Onozuka M. Chewing and attention: a positive effect on sustained attention. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:367026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Tramonti Fantozzi MP, De Cicco V, De Cicco D, d'Ascanio P, Cataldo E, Bruschini L, et al. Chewing and cognitive improvement: the side matters. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021;15:749444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data S1.

NPR2-44-109-s002.pdf (617KB, pdf)

Data S2.

NPR2-44-109-s001.xlsx (28.1KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are made available in the Supplementary Material of this article (Data S1 and Data S2) following approval by Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) (ID: IRCT2017060918951N3).


Articles from Neuropsychopharmacology Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES