Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 28;11:1218912. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1218912

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses for the association between dietary pattern and hyperuricemia risk.

Plant-based dietary pattern Animal foods dietary pattern
No. of study OR (95%CI) I2(%) P* P** No. of study OR (95%CI) I2(%) P* P**
Overall 10 0.83 (0.72–0.94) 72.9 <0.01 11 1.36 (1.25–1.47) 26.7 0.19
Subgroup analyses
Study design 0.52 0.44
Cohort study 1 0.79 (0.72–0.87) N/A N/A 1 1.24 (1.13–1.37) N/A N/A
Case–control study 2 0.52 (0.17–1.58) 91.2 <0.01 2 1.62 (1.20, 2.20) 23.9 0.25
Cross-sectional study 7 0.87 (0.74–1.03) 70.3 <0.01 8 1.38 (1.27, 1.50) 1.5 0.42
Sample size 0.55 0.59
≥ median 5 0.78 (0.73–0.84) 0 0.64 5 1.38 (1.25, 1.52) 35.8 0.18
< median 5 0.84 (0.61–1.15) 81.8 <0.01 6 1.32 (1.12, 1.55) 30.2 0.21
Study quality 0.46 0.07
High quality 6 0.76 (0.61–0.95) 75.2 <0.01 6 1.30 (1.13, 1.50) 41.9 0.13
Moderate quality 4 0.88 (0.72–1.08) 76.1 <0.01 5 1.44 (1.31, 1.58) 0 0.94
Dietary pattern identified 0.88 0.05
Factor analysis 3 0.80 (0.72–0.88) 0 0.50 3 1.49 (1.33–1.66) 0 0.97
principal component analysis 7 0.82 (0.67–1.01) 80.8 <0.01 8 1.29 (1.18–1.42) 15.8 0.31
Varimax rotation for dietary pattern 0.64 0.82
Yes 9 0.84 (0.73–0.97) 74.2 <0.01 10 1.35 (1.24, 1.48) 33.1 0.14
No 1 0.70 (0.56–0.87) N/A N/A 1 1.40 (1.13–1.74) N/A N/A
Adjustment for potential confounders
Total energy intake 0.87 0.55
Yes 6 0.82 (0.74–0.92) 48.2 0.08 7 1.34 (1.20, 1.49) 41.4 0.10
No 4 0.76 (0.52–1.12) 86.6 <0.01 4 1.41 (1.23, 1.62) 0 0.53
Education level 0.13 0.99
Yes 8 0.77 (0.67–0.89) 78.7 <0.01 9 1.36 (1.23, 1.50) 41.1 0.09
No 2 1.07 (0.91–1.26) 0 0.56 2 1.36 (1.13, 1.64) 0 0.85
Physical activity 0.65 0.20
Yes 5 0.77 (0.60–0.99) 79.0 <0.01 6 1.33 (1.15, 1.53) 47.2 0.09
No 5 0.85 (0.71–1.02) 71.4 <0.01 5 1.43 (1.30, 1.57) 0 0.91

*P-Value for heterogeneity within each subgroup. **P-Value for heterogeneity between subgroups with meta-regression analysis.