Table 3.
Reasons for rejection/withdrawal at NSAP
| Paper No | Reason |
|---|---|
| 1 | The paper was considered withdrawn as the authors did not respond to the revision instructions and ignored several attempts to contact them |
| 2 | The paper was withdrawn by the authors without giving a reason |
| 3 | The paper was withdrawn by the authors without giving a reason |
| 4 | The paper was rejected since the authors did not provide original data |
| 5 | The paper has been withdrawn by the authors. Unfortunately, we did not find out if the authors gave a reason for the withdrawal |
| 6 | The paper was rejected because plagiarism was detected. In addition, the reviewer did not find it useful or novel |
| 7 | The paper was rejected. Unfortunately, we did not find the reason in the rejection report |
| 8 | The paper was rejected because it contained a number of phrases taken from other published papers |
| 9 | The paper was rejected since the authors did not provide data requested by the reviewers. Furthermore, reviewers reported concerns about the credibility of some data |
| 10 | The paper was rejected because reviewers criticized language, form, and content as deficient |