Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;14:6007. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56728-5

Table 2.

Demographic and clinical characteristics of headache according to coffee consumption in participants with migraine.

No-to-low coffee consumption, N = 54 Moderate coffee consumption, N = 83 High coffee consumption, N = 33 p-value
Age, median (IQR) 36.0 (27.0–43.0) 42.0 (36.0–50.0) 42.0 (36.5–45.5) 0.001§†
Sex, women, N (%) 41 (75.9) 68 (81.9) 20 (60.6) 0.053
Body mass index, median (IQR) 22.2 (20.4–24.9) 22.9 (20.4–25.0) 23.3 (20.7–26.3) 0.594
Monthly headache days, median (IQR) 3.0 (2.0–10.0) 3.0 (2.0–5.0) 2.0 (1.5–5.0) 0.084
Monthly severe headache days, median (IQR) 3.0 (1.0–5.0) 2.0 (1.0–3.0) 1.0 (1.0–3.5) 0.172
Monthly acute medication days, median (IQR) 2.0 (1.0–5.0) 2.0 (1.0–5.0) 2.0 (1.0–4.5) 0.886
NRS for headache intensity, median (IQR) 7.0 (7.0–8.0) 7.0 (7.0–8.0) 7.0 (7.0–8.0) 0.337
Unilateral pain, N (%) 27 (50.0) 45 (54.2) 19 (57.6) 0.777
Pulsating quality, N (%) 30 (55.6) 56 (67.5) 21 (63.6) 0.368
Exacerbation by routine physical activity, N (%) 45 (83.3) 66 (79.5) 27 (81.8) 0.851
Nausea, N (%) 38 (70.4) 58 (69.9) 24 (72.7) 0.954
Vomiting, N (%) 22 (40.7) 42 (50.6) 18 (54.5) 0.382
Photophobia, N (%) 39 (72.2) 62 (74.7) 24 (72.7) 0.943
Phonophobia, N (%) 39 (72.2) 73 (88.0) 25 (75.8) 0.055
MIDAS, median (IQR) 12.0 (6.0–37.0) 14.0 (6.0–27.0) 13.0 (5.5–29.5) 0.515
Anxiety, N (%) 28 (51.9) 27 (32.5) 12 (36.4) 0.072
Depression, N (%) 17 (31.5) 10 (12.0) 3 (9.1) 0.003§†
Insomnia, N (%) 12 (22.2) 14 (16.9) 6 (18.2) 0.732
Stress, N (%) 33 (61.1) 28 (33.7) 10 (30.3) 0.002§†
Preventive medication use, N (%) 3 (5.6) 5 (6.0) 0 (0.0) 0.361
Current smoking, N (%) 11 (20.4) 7 (8.4) 18 (54.5) < 0.001†‡

For the p-values, categorical variables were compared using the Pearson’s χ2 test and the continuous variables were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test or analysis of covariance adjusted for age, sex, and body index mass.

§There was a significant difference between no-to-low coffee consumption and moderate coffee consumption in a post hoc analysis.

†There was a significant difference between no-to-low coffee consumption and high coffee consumption in a post hoc analysis.

‡There was a significant difference between moderate coffee consumption and high coffee consumption in a post hoc analysis.

IQR interquartile range, NRS numerical rating scale, MIDAS migraine disability assessment.