Table 3.
Comparison between tissue compositions of nutritionally balanced cultivars at high yield level (> 50 ton ha−1).
| Nutrient | ‘Caeté’ | ‘Mulata’ | ‘Omega’ | ‘SCS373 Valessul’ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clr | Centroid | Clr | Centroid | Clr | Centroid | Clr | Centroid | |
| C.I. (0.01) | g kg−1 | C.I. (0.01) | g kg−1 | C.I. (0.01) | g kg−1 | C.I. (0.01) | g kg−1 | |
| N | (2.859, 2.935) | 30.7 | (3.334, 3.418) | 37.2 | (3.109, 3.177) | 25.6 | (3.172, 3.262) | 26.8 |
| P | (0.854, 1.008) | 4.3 | (0.995, 1.106) | 3.6 | (1.073, 1.137) | 3.3 | (1.864, 1.913) | 7.1 |
| K | (2.685, 2.749) | 25.7 | (3.370, 3.504) | 39.5 | (3.265, 3.341) | 30.1 | (3/234, 3.314) | 28.4 |
| Ca | (1.748, 1.813) | 10.1 | (2.560, 2.725) | 17.9 | (2.624, 2.726) | 16.1 | (2.011, 2.117) | 8.5 |
| Mg | (0.644, 0.712) | 3.3 | (0.724, 0.898) | 2.9 | (0.917, 1.017) | 2.9 | (0.864, 0.919) | 2.6 |
| S | (1.449, 1.575) | 7.7 | (0.823, 1.023) | 3.2 | (0.912, 1.013) | 2.9 | (1.369, 1.475) | 4.4 |
| B | (− 3.859, − 3.726) | 0.038 | (− 3.815, − 3.611) | 0.031 | (− 3.619, − 3.536) | 0.031 | (− 4.063, − 3.973) | 0.019 |
| Cu | (− 3.951, − 3.850) | 0.034 | (− 4.862, − 4.406) | 0.012 | (− 5.067, − 4.832) | 0.008 | (− 4.687, − 4.398) | 0.011 |
| Zn | (− 3.332, − 3.241) | 0.063 | (− 3.681, − 3.395) | 0.037 | (− 3.628, − 3.464) | 0.032 | (− 3.873, − 3.784) | 0.023 |
| Mn | (− 2.794, − 2.366) | 0.129 | (− 2.825, − 2.655) | 0.082 | (− 2.913, − 2.813) | 0.063 | (− 4.089, − 3.954) | 0.019 |
| Fe | (− 3.364, − 3.138) | 0.066 | (− 4.362, − 3.983) | 0.020 | (− 4.040, − 3.842) | 0.021 | (− 3.147, − 3.058) | 0.048 |
| Fv† | (6.259, 6.329) | 917.9 | (6.522, 6.592) | 895.5 | (6.701, 6.743) | 918.9 | (6.722, 6.789) | 922.1 |
Values in parentheses are confidence intervals (C.I.) about centered log ratio ( means at P = 0.01. Centroids are means of values that have been back-transformed to familiar raw concentration values.
† Filling value calculated by the difference between the geometric means and the initial filling value.