Table 2.
Results of calibration and validation in three periods measured by the three metrics.
| Calibration | Validation | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | PBIAS (%) | R2 | PBIAS (%) | |||
| Baseline | ||||||
| Tangnaiai | 0.76 | 0.83 | 3.90 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 5.95 |
| Lanzhou | 0.73 | 0.85 | 15.71 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 16.93 |
| Toudaoguai | 0.68 | 0.80 | 12.45 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 11.62 |
| Huaxian | 0.60 | 0.77 | − 13.71 | 0.78 | 0.85 | 1.61 |
| Huanyuankou | 0.63 | 0.79 | 4.88 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 9.70 |
| 1990s | ||||||
| Tangnaiai | 0.68 | 0.75 | 18.59 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 21.45 |
| Lanzhou | 0.74 | 0.84 | 14.39 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 13.84 |
| Toudaoguai | 0.65 | 0.74 | 15.69 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 7.86 |
| Huaxian | 0.62 | 0.71 | 20.08 | 0.66 | 0.70 | 2.11 |
| Huanyuankou | 0.59 | 0.73 | 12.43 | 0.67 | 0.74 | 3.87 |
| 2000s | ||||||
| Tangnaiai | 0.83 | 0.83 | 3.20 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 7.53 |
| Lanzhou | 0.78 | 0.86 | 8.64 | 0.76 | 0.90 | 8.93 |
| Toudaoguai | 0.70 | 0.76 | 13.86 | 0.65 | 0.76 | 13.91 |
| Huaxian | 0.76 | 0.76 | − 8.64 | 0.69 | 0.78 | − 7.72 |
| Huanyuankou | 0.61 | 0.72 | 24.73 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 14.23 |