Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 20;15(2):110–116. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2023-102531

Table 1.

Key measures by intervention period

Description of measure no (%) Preintervention Intervention roll-out P value* Postintervention P value* Sustainability P value*
Any documentation of assessment for paracentesis—includes alert response 74 (60.1) 74 (55.6) 0.53 169 (93.5) <0.005 115 (95.9) <0.005
Assessment for paracentesis documented in provider note 74 (60.1) 74 (55.6) 0.53 137 (75.7) 0.005 98 (81.7) <0.005
Evidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis† 3 (2.4) 3 (2.3) 1.00 6 (3.3) 0.74 5 (4.0) 0.50
Ascites potentially amenable to paracentesis‡ 57 (46.3) 57 (42.9) 0.62 57 (31.5) 0.011 47 (39.2) 0.30
Diagnostic paracentesis any time during admission 34 (59.7) 34 (59.7) 1.00 53 (93.0) <0.005 43 (91.5) <0.005
Diagnostic paracentesis during first 24 hours of admission 30 (52.6) 27 (47.4) 0.71 44 (77.2) 0.01 34 (72.4) 0.04

*All p value reference comparison between the study group and the preintervention group.

†Defined as ascitic fluid polymorphonuclear cell count over 250 cells per microliter.

‡Includes patient encounters where ascites was present and there was no documentation that patient had insufficient fluid to safely perform the procedure or other contraindication to the procedure.