Table 2.
Biomass of the separate components of C. esculentus under various intercropping treatments (kg·acre-2/g).
| Organ | Treatment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC | 4:4CM | 4:4CG | 8:4CM | 8:4CG | |
| Leaf | 101.60 ± 19.02 b | 159.36 ± 32.15 a | 137.01 ± 36.61 ab | 126.18 ± 26.72 ab | 128.44 ± 24.02 ab |
| Root | 29.51 ± 3.48 d | 41.56 ± 6.19 bc | 52.65 ± 5.38 a | 33.79 ± 3.33 cd | 43.51 ± 3.51 b |
| Tuber | 141.87 ± 7.81 c | 184.11 ± 16.98 ab | 197.22 ± 27.09 a | 156.91 ± 27.32 bc | 162.70 ± 17.17 abc |
The different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between intercropping treatments at P < 0.05. MC, 4:4CM, 4:4CG, 8:4CM, and 8:4CG represent monocropping C. esculentus, 4:4 C. esculentus/Medicago sativa L. intercropping, 4:4 C. esculentus/Glycine max (L.) Merr., 8:4 C. esculentus/Medicago sativa L., and 8:4 C. esculentus/Glycine max (L.) Merr. intercropping, respectively.