Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 12;24:271. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05257-w

Table 2.

Results of the perception of individual practical skills between groups. Data are presented as median (IQR)

3rd year students (n = 25) 4th year students (n = 25) 5th year students (n = 25) p value
Whole field of conservative dentistry and periodontology 72 (43–100)a 52 (30–58) 29 (10–52)a < 0.01
Endodontology 76 (37–100) 80 (58–134) 55 (33–100) 0.23
Periodontology 135 (72–186)ac 47 (33–70)bc 12 (0–30)ab < 0.01
Cariology 80 (46–115)ac 32 (14–63)c 20 (9–40)a < 0.01
Restorative dentistry 100 (68–117)ac 72 (33–87)c 33 (10–82)a < 0.01
Preventive dentistry 104 (151 − 72)ac 13 (3–25)c 6 (0–15)a < 0.01

Values are given as the distance between the object and subject disc in millimeters, shown as the mean values and standard deviation

aSignificant difference in post-hoc testing between the 3rd and 5th years (p ≤ 0.01)

bSignificant difference in post-hoc testing between the 4th and 5th years (p ≤ 0.01)

cSignificant difference in post-hoc testing between the 3rd and 4th years (p ≤ 0.01)