Table 2.
Results of the perception of individual practical skills between groups. Data are presented as median (IQR)
| 3rd year students (n = 25) | 4th year students (n = 25) | 5th year students (n = 25) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole field of conservative dentistry and periodontology | 72 (43–100)a | 52 (30–58) | 29 (10–52)a | < 0.01 |
| Endodontology | 76 (37–100) | 80 (58–134) | 55 (33–100) | 0.23 |
| Periodontology | 135 (72–186)ac | 47 (33–70)bc | 12 (0–30)ab | < 0.01 |
| Cariology | 80 (46–115)ac | 32 (14–63)c | 20 (9–40)a | < 0.01 |
| Restorative dentistry | 100 (68–117)ac | 72 (33–87)c | 33 (10–82)a | < 0.01 |
| Preventive dentistry | 104 (151 − 72)ac | 13 (3–25)c | 6 (0–15)a | < 0.01 |
Values are given as the distance between the object and subject disc in millimeters, shown as the mean values and standard deviation
aSignificant difference in post-hoc testing between the 3rd and 5th years (p ≤ 0.01)
bSignificant difference in post-hoc testing between the 4th and 5th years (p ≤ 0.01)
cSignificant difference in post-hoc testing between the 3rd and 4th years (p ≤ 0.01)