Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 13;25:214. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07337-w

Table 1.

Comparison and correlations in SCSA (mm2) and DFF (%) for paravertebral muscles of different Pfirrmann gradings (x ± s)

Pfirrmann grading Number of discs (240) Paravertebral muscle
(IWS before)
Paravertebral muscle
(IWS after)
Paravertebral muscle
(IWOS before)
Paravertebral muscle
(IWOS after)
SCAS DFF SCAS DFF SCAS DFF SCAS DFF
I 14 60.42 ± 14.69 9.16 ± 2.41 59.05 ± 18.41 10.00 ± 2.25 67.44 ± 12.58 11.46 ± 1.76 66.73 ± 17.26 10.65 ± 1.95
II 78 56.42 ± 15.28 12.41 ± 2.77 56.10 ± 17.78 11.50 ± 2.45 61.57 ± 14.93 12.17 ± 1.91 63.78 ± 15.77 12.23 ± 2.25
III 101 52.53 ± 13.91 14.48 ± 2.36 54.69 ± 15.05 14.74 ± 2.08 59.51 ± 15.96 13.32 ± 1.87 64.97 ± 13.75 12.92 ± 1.83
IV 31 48.86 ± 12.20 15.17 ± 1.79 50.01 ± 12.43 14.56 ± 2.30 59.89 ± 14.43 14.06 ± 1.61 53.66 ± 10.42 13.96 ± 1.88
V 16 48.83 ± 12.83 14.04 ± 2.51 46.30 ± 14.49 14.10 ± 2.73 55.15 ± 14.67 14.40 ± 1.91 51.54 ± 12.13 13.96 ± 2.09
r -0.216 0.430 -0.152 0.499 -0.137 0.435 -0.236 0.346
p 0.001 0.000 0.019 0.000 0.034 0.000 0.000 0.000

SCSA Standard cross-sectional area, DFF Degree of fatty infiltration, IFC Interferential current, IWS Intervertebral disc degeneration patients with sarcopenia, IWOS Intervertebral disc degeneration patients without sarcopenia

*P < 0.05, statistically significant differences. Before IFC stimulation: r = -0.216, r = 0.430; r = -0.137, r = 0.435; After IFC stimulation: r = -0.152, r = 0.499; r = -0.236, r = 0.346